On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:37:01 -0700, Gail
<> wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion but I would prefer having them both running.
Not a good idea! You achieve no extra protection, you incur the extra
overhead of running two firewalls, and you run the risk (probably
small, but not zero) of conflicts between them.
See
http://www.microsoft.com/athome/secu.../firewall.mspx
which includes the following:
"Q. Should I use both the built-in firewall and a software firewall
from a different company on my Windows XP computer?
"A. No. Running multiple software firewalls is unnecessary for typical
home computers, home networking, and small-business networking
scenarios. Using two firewalls on the same connection could cause
issues with connectivity to the Internet or other unexpected behavior.
One firewall, whether it is the Windows XP Internet Connection
Firewall or a different software firewall, can provide substantial
protection for your computer."
That's about XP, but the principle is the same.
> I'm
> just getting a little tired of having to turn the vista firewall on manually.
>
> "t-4-2" wrote:
>
> >
> > Gail;698887 Wrote:
> > > I am running Windows Live OneCare and the firewall is enabled. The Vista
> > > Firewall services are set to automatic, however on bootup the Vista
> > > Firewall
> > > is turned off. Shouldn't be a problem but whenever the Vista Firewall
> > > is
> > > disabled I am getting unwanted traiffic on my laptop which the Live
> > > OneCare
> > > isn't blocking. Any ideas??
> > Hello Gail,
> > I don't have Live OneCare, but can't you disable it's firewall, and
> > keep the Vista firewall on? You said it already, " Live OneCare isn't
> > blocking --".
> >
> >
> > --
> > t-4-2
> >
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup