vista inbuilt burner or nero 7.5?

which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero 7.5?

I would choose Nero 7x since you are able to accomplish a wider array
burning projects with and use more formats compared to the built in DVD
Burning solutions in Vista. Not that I'm saying the one in Vista is not
good, its just that you are able to do more and work more flexible with
NERO.
--
Andre
Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
My Vista Quickstart Guide:
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
"Neerav" <> wrote in message
news:56277262-E17D-42D9-B0CE-...
> which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero 7.5?

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:44:34 +0530, Neerav wrote:

> which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero
> 7.5?

NOT nero 7.x it was full of problems.. nero has been updated to version
8.2.X !!!

My advice is if you have a key for nero 8, search for the micro (lite)
editions because nero is a monster application much like vista itself.

if you cant buy or dont have nero 8 take a look at www.cdburnerxp.se
totally free and vista compatible!

thanks a lot guys.
"Neerav" <> wrote in message
news:56277262-E17D-42D9-B0CE-...
> which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero 7.5?

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:44:34 +0530, "Neerav" <>
wrote:

> which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero 7.5?


Nero.

With very rare exceptions, *all* the utilities that come with the
operating system (Vista, XP, or any other Microsoft operating system)
are more primitive and less capable than the other choices available.

However that does *not* mean that everyone should rush out to buy
replacements for all of these. You should try what comes with Vista
and see if it meets *your* needs. If it does, regardless of whether
something else may be better, it's not necessary for *you*.


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

"Neerav" <> wrote in message
news:56277262-E17D-42D9-B0CE-...
> which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero 7.5?


Imgburn is free.

--
Michael Chare

"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:44:34 +0530, "Neerav" <>
> wrote:
>
> > which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero 7.5?
>
>
> Nero.
>
> With very rare exceptions, *all* the utilities that come with the
> operating system (Vista, XP, or any other Microsoft operating system)
> are more primitive and less capable than the other choices available.
>
> However that does *not* mean that everyone should rush out to buy
> replacements for all of these. You should try what comes with Vista
> and see if it meets *your* needs. If it does, regardless of whether
> something else may be better, it's not necessary for *you*.
>
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>

Mr. Blake,

Nice answer. How can anyone insinuate that you are a Microsoft fanboy when
you give advice like this?

Have a nice day.

C.B.

"Michael Chare" wrote:

> "Neerav" <> wrote in message
> news:56277262-E17D-42D9-B0CE-...
> > which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero 7.5?
>
>
> Imgburn is free.
>
> --
> Michael Chare
>
> Ashampoo Burning Studio was recommended some time ago in this newsgroup. Have extensively used it, and for $30 or less, it's a real bargain.

Co-sign. Nero offers CDText and disc-at-once (gapless CD burning)
functionality that the Vista burner doesn't have. If you keep burning mix
CDs for the car, you'lll probably find the money very well spent. =)

I have nothing against Roxio or the other various choices out there that
also offer this functionality.

That being said, I'm not the biggest fan of the *Nero DVD burning*
functionality, but I think that's a hard area to get right. =)

--
Speaking for myself only.
See http://zachd.com/pss/pss.html for some helpful WMP info.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--

"Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <> wrote in message
news:...
>I would choose Nero 7x since you are able to accomplish a wider array
>burning projects with and use more formats compared to the built in DVD
>Burning solutions in Vista. Not that I'm saying the one in Vista is not
>good, its just that you are able to do more and work more flexible with
>NERO.
> --
> Andre
> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
> "Neerav" <> wrote in message
> news:56277262-E17D-42D9-B0CE-...
>> which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero
>> 7.5?

"CB" <> wrote in message
news:C8479FE8-CE20-4D44-940D-...
>
>
> "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:44:34 +0530, "Neerav" <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > which is a better cd and dvd burner? the one built into vista or nero
>> > 7.5?
>>
>>
>> Nero.
>>
>> With very rare exceptions, *all* the utilities that come with the
>> operating system (Vista, XP, or any other Microsoft operating system)
>> are more primitive and less capable than the other choices available.
>>
>> However that does *not* mean that everyone should rush out to buy
>> replacements for all of these. You should try what comes with Vista
>> and see if it meets *your* needs. If it does, regardless of whether
>> something else may be better, it's not necessary for *you*.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
>> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>
>
> Mr. Blake,
>
> Nice answer. How can anyone insinuate that you are a Microsoft fanboy when
> you give advice like this?

Anyone that DOESN'T bash is a fanboy in the smacktard's eyes. Since I am
able to make Vista function well, I'll probably be accused of being one
myself. This is hardly the case. I'm one that will blast whoever, whenever,
if it doesn't work. I blasted Norton on my blog over that piece of crap they
call 360. I have a big problem with a lot of MS's business practices. That
being said, I DO come to these newsgroups to help fix any problems I may
encounter, get tips, and try and help others when I can because I wish to
have the same done in return. Like many others here, I use Vista, or
whatever because it helps me do what I need to get done the best at the
moment. If it turns out in the future than say Linux, or Mac does what I
need it to, I will use that. I WON'T however, try and bash/flame/troll the
choice anyone else makes to help them be the most productive.

--
Ok, I got the big purple f*cker, Sponge Bob is next!!
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
You know what to do with the munge