On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:27:40 -0400, Retroman wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 23:49:36 -0700, "Gene E. Bloch" <not->
> wrote:
>
>>> [snip]
>>> This area is curious and not at all well documented, but I've learned a
>>> few things about it.
>>>
>>> First, just because a drive isn't indexed doesn't mean that it will never
>>> be searched. My USB flash drive is not indexed (according to the indexing
>>> dialog) but it does get searched from the Start menu window. It's almost
>>> as if a separate index was created.
>>>
>>> Second, by design Start menu searching works quite differently than from
>>> Win Explorer, so it's normal to get different results from there than
>>> elsewhere.
>>>
>>> For example, Windows utilities like msconfig can be found very quickly
>>> from the Start menu search, but not from Win Explorer with an indexed
>>> search if the \Windows folder was excluded from indexing.
>>>
>>> Doug M. in NJ
>>
>>Perhaps index != search...
>>
>>What I mean is that indexing prepares in advance a list of search items,
>>but searching may very well search both that index and the unindexed files.
>>
>>The above is a guess, but that doesn't mean it's a bad guess :-)
>
> Hi Gene,
>
> I agree that a Start menu search does include some non-indexed areas,
> regardless of settings in the main indexing options dialog. However, it
> is unclear why those searches are so much faster than the same searches of
> both areas from Win Explorer.
>
> Perhaps when the "search programs" option is enabled in the Customize
> Start Menu dialog, known program folders are searched first. This could
> explain why executables like msconfig come up so much faster in Start menu
> searches. That option is not available for searches from Win Explorer.
>
> Doug M. in NJ
That makes sense. thanks.
--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom
|