Hi Anne,
Vista's defragmenter is fine and as you are not a heavy user defragmenting
monthly should be okay.
The third party defragmenter I recommended, PerfectDisk, defragments the
drive far better than the one Vista has, after all, it is an extremely
'light' version of Diskeeper.
Vista's defragmenter does the job it is supposed to do but, like everything
else, free versions are only the basic, for more substantial features you
have to pay for them. PerfectDisk also defrags the boot files, something
that Vista defragmenter doesn't do, yes the boot files can be defragged
using command line parameters but it isn't something that the Vista
defragmenter does automatically.
Most users complain about the Vista defragmenter, not because it isn't any
good, but because they can't see what it is doing. If you used Windows XP
you will remember that the disk defragmenter displayed a progress bar
showing how much fragmentation you had and also how disk defragmenter was
re-arranging it. Windows Vista doesn't have this user friendly interface and
people resent that; but that was a decision Microsoft took and they will,
know doubt, stick to it.
Auslogic, on the other hand is free and has a user friendly interface where
you can see, block by block, exactly how the drive is being defragmented and
what the progress is.
Even though PerfectDisk has a friendly interface and also displays the
progress of the defragmentation it is very rare that I sit and watch each
block move around the screen. I just set it and forget it.
So, Anne, in a nutshell you aren't missing anything by using the Vista
defragmenter unless, of course, you want to see little blocks being moved
around. Personally I think it's like watching paint dry.
--
--
John Barnett MVP
Windows XP Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience
Web:
http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web:
http://vistasupport.mvps.org
Web:
http://www.silversurfer-guide.com
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
"Anne" <> wrote in message
news:L1NNk.252295$...
>
> "John Barnett MVP" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>>I personally use CCleaner, but 'not' the registry option. My philosophy on
>>registry cleaners is: 'if you are not competent enough to edit the
>>registry manually, then leave well alone.' Registry cleaner cause more
>>problems than they solve.
>>
>> Defragmenting the drive is a must. I don't use Vista's own defragmenter I
>> much prefer third party defragmenters. I use PerfectDisk and my hard
>> drive is defragged every week.
>>
> Hi John,
>
> Is there a reason why you suggest a 3rd party defragmenter?
>
> I don't use this box for business and am not a heavy user except for a
> little photo editing.
>
> Am I missing something using Vista's defrag?
>
> thanks, anne
>