vista performance

Stop giving out your stupid advice here.

"Paul Montgomery" wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:23:07 -0700, marty
> <> wrote:
>
> >hi,iwould like a bit of advice regarding the performance of vista.I do a lot
> >of video converting and file copying(from a external hard drive)also
> >unzipping rar files, my question is will disabling as much of the vista "eye
> >candy"as possible make much difference to the speed of these tasks.
>
> I should help a lot. Can't hurt anything to try, right?
>
> You could also add another 2G of RAM if your OS is 32-bit, more if
> it's 64-bit.
>
> >i am aware
> >that file conversion is heavy on recsoureses and much will depend on my
> >laptops specs,i am running vista hp sp1 2gb ram dual core 1.6 processor.I
> >dont have any complaints about vista and generally it does a good job but can
> >be a bit sluggish when i am using a lot of rescoureses especialy copy and
> >paste every thing just about locks up then and it will take anything from
> >1mins to 1hour to copy a 700mb file depending on the weather while i am
> >writing this i am unpacking afile that is listed as 15gb in its propertiesand
> >at the moment it is at 82% after 33mins does this sound about right? any
> >advice will be appreciated
>

You are an utter fool in these Newsgroups.
Go back to Ubuntu; your only home.

"Non Sequitur!" wrote:

> install xp
>
> its far faster
>
> "marty" <> wrote in message
> news:E965D182-6F13-4B24-A245-...
> > hi,iwould like a bit of advice regarding the performance of vista.I do a
> > lot
> > of video converting and file copying(from a external hard drive)also
> > unzipping rar files, my question is will disabling as much of the vista
> > "eye
> > candy"as possible make much difference to the speed of these tasks.i am
> > aware
> > that file conversion is heavy on recsoureses and much will depend on my
> > laptops specs,i am running vista hp sp1 2gb ram dual core 1.6 processor.I
> > dont have any complaints about vista and generally it does a good job but
> > can
> > be a bit sluggish when i am using a lot of rescoureses especialy copy and
> > paste every thing just about locks up then and it will take anything from
> > 1mins to 1hour to copy a 700mb file depending on the weather while i am
> > writing this i am unpacking afile that is listed as 15gb in its
> > propertiesand
> > at the moment it is at 82% after 33mins does this sound about right? any
> > advice will be appreciated
> > --
> > martyb
>
>

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:51:01 -0700, marty
<> wrote:

>hi,thanks for the quick resonse,i am disabling alot of stuff i dont really
>need running. i dont think i can add any more ram as my laptop specs say it
>is 2gb max ,any idea why that is,i bought it as 1gb and quickly put the other
>gb in after a month of using it so i will turn off anything i dont need and
>see how much difference it makes ,thanks

Turn off all the services you don't need:

http://www.blackviper.com/WinVista/servicecfg.htm

There even is a utility to do that so that you can more easily undo
your changes.

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:53:01 -0700, Mr. Arnold
<> wrote:

>Stop giving out your stupid advice here.
>
>"Paul Montgomery" wrote:

Save the spoofing for someone who doesn't know the difference.

Don't stop - I'm glad you're doing it - just don't waste your time
using it on me.

Non Sequitur! wrote:
> Ubuntu is good, but not good enough...
>
> Vista is just plain bad, its best possibility is just to merely endure
> it and hope for a better wnidows7
>
> XP outperforms Vista on all tasks, is cleaner, better designed, more
> compatible, and more ergonomic than vista
>

Who are you responding to? It's certainly not me. :-P I have seen your
many posts not reading the content of them. But I have seen your many
posts. I wouldn't engage you about anything.

"Non Sequitur!" <> wrote in message news:48f7efd8$...


>Ubuntu as an operating system far
>surpasses XP or Vista, its only drawback is the lack of applications that
>have been ported to it and drivers.


So basically Ubuntu is a great OS with no user apps ported over to it?
Gee wiz..sign me up right away!!!!

"Non Sequitur!" wrote:

> it has lots of apps just not the ones I use, like corel or photoshop
>
> "Little Charlie" <> wrote in message
> news:skSJk.53173$. ..
> > "Non Sequitur!" <> wrote in message
> > news:48f7efd8$...
> >
> >>Ubuntu as an operating system far
> >>surpasses XP or Vista, its only drawback is the lack of applications that
> >>have been ported to it and drivers.
> >
> > So basically Ubuntu is a great OS with no user apps ported over to it?
> > Gee wiz..sign me up right away!!!!

And I have spoofed, and abused here for a long, long time.
But, I have been out-spoofed, and out-abused!
Congratulations to the Ultimate Spoofer / Abuser!
I hand over the Crown.

These are some of my Spoofs, and Aliases

Anti on Chicken Little(s)
Chicken Little Albright
Dan S-illy aka Barney Phife
Doctor Bee
General Paul Montgomery
General Paul Montgomery1
General Paul Montgomery2
General Paul Montgomery3
General Paul Montgomery4
General Paul Montgomery5
General Paul Montgomery6
General Paul Montgomery7
Hunting for JackA$$
Junk Yard Dog
Kotex Queen Clear Windows
Mick Murphy
Montgumdrop
Mr. Arnold
MontGumDropped1 Paul
Paul MontDenturesDropped
Paul Montgomery
Paul Montgomery 9000
Paul Montgumdrop
Pauly
Ringmonster
Sudden Impact
Tall Tales Albright
The Bee
The Big Ticket
The Hornet
Van Helsing the Albright Hunter


>
>

Paul Montgomery wrote:
> <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm>
>
> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.
>
> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious
> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$
> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a
> X$x" "in X$#" "is
> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just
> like X$#" "X#$"
> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$
> PARTY" "X$#" "hated
> wherever he goes!" "X#$
>
> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and
> thus illegal
>
> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries
>
> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do
> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of
> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the
> average reader would not be able to detect.
>
> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they
> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well
> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a
> troll.
>
> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise
> the seriousness of this offence.
>
> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints
> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.
> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities
> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is
> also worth registering with
> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/
>
>

Paul Montgomery wrote:
> <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm>
>
> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.
>
> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious
> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$
> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a
> X$x" "in X$#" "is
> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just
> like X$#" "X#$"
> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$
> PARTY" "X$#" "hated
> wherever he goes!" "X#$
>
> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and
> thus illegal
>
> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries
>
> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do
> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of
> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the
> average reader would not be able to detect.
>
> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they
> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well
> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a
> troll.
>
> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise
> the seriousness of this offence.
>
> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints
> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.
> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities
> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is
> also worth registering with
> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/
>
>

Paul Montgomery wrote:
> <http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killfile/anti_troll_faq.htm>
>
> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.
>
> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious
> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$
> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a
> X$x" "in X$#" "is
> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just
> like X$#" "X#$"
> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$
> PARTY" "X$#" "hated
> wherever he goes!" "X#$
>
> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and
> thus illegal
>
> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries
>
> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do
> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of
> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the
> average reader would not be able to detect.
>
> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they
> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well
> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a
> troll.
>
> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise
> the seriousness of this offence.
>
> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints
> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.
> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities
> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is
> also worth registering with
> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/
>
>