"Mr. Newt" <lektrikpuke@_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2O-dnfrjG7GzidvbnZ2dnUVZ_q-...
>
> "Matthieu" <> wrote in message
> news:. ..
>>>
>>> These seem to be pretty minor reasons to condemn an entire operating
>>> system.
>>>
>>> If you did not expect the user interface to change, then what did you
>>> expect from a new operating system? Indeed, as I recall the change in
>>> user interface was widely reported as one of the biggest changes.
>>>
>>> I am not sure that all you are describing is 'bugs' rather than
>>> changes or user misunderstandings but if you did not expect to find
>>> bugs in a brand new operating system then you don't know much about
>>> software.
>>>
>>>> ....
>>
>> I do work in software and I do know no software is bug free. But
>> regressions on basic functions as search.....
>
> Once you turn off UAC, and get by the fact that some of your favorite
> programs no longer work as they should, Vista's not half bad. Not bad for
> a beta version.
>
> Too bad they didn't finish it a little better in the betas and RC's. Just
> my opinion.
Oh, just found out that the TCP inconsistencies have not been fixed yet,
either. Damn it, that one makes me mad. I can deal with the rest, but
communication is what this day and age is all about. Come on MS, wake up
and smell the coffee!!!
|