Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org
"Alias" <> wrote in message
news:fe2t04$535$...
> Jupiter Jones [MVP] wrote:
>> Not at all since windows Vista is long past Beta.
>>
>
> Depends on your definition of Beta. As far as I can tell, every
single release of all Windows OSes were released as Betas so MS could
use the paying public for free to sort out bugs that weren't noticed in
the so-called "real" Beta and Vista could be more appropriately called
in Public Alpha right now. The jury is out if it will ever make it to
Beta or be thrown away like Windows Me for Vienna.
>
> --
> Alias
> To email me, remove shoes
> "Depends on your definition of Beta."
> False.
> You nor I determine when a product is Beta, the manufacturer makes that
> determination.
>
> That is your opinion and some can say the same for virtually all
> software from any source.
> The fact is Windows Vista is not Beta.
>
> Those who feel otherwise are free to choose any of the many other
> options available.
> And those that do, probably should.
"A rose by any other name smells just a sweet".
You missed my point as it flew way over your head.
--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes