Leythos wrote:
> In article <>,
> says...
>> Totally so when you consider it isn't necessary and
>> does nothing to stop real hackers or software thieves and only serves
>> to annoy and irritate actual paying customers.
>
> I know many instances from many people where license violations were
> prevented by the activation process. We also found, in the XP group, a
> violation that a nice lady reported that exposed a company that was
> installing XP against licensing and she was able to sue them in court
> and get money.
>
> So, it appears that Activation does stop pirates.
Only the stupid more layman types. However, it does nothing to stop
piracy, as people use use activation cracks that completely disable the
activation mechanism, turning it into the corporate version in that
regard. Oh hell, some people download the corporate versions which don't
require activation.
Yet we as users have to jump through hoops while pirates in geenral
still do there thing. This is true for Windows, general software that
followed Micorsoft's lead with activation schemes, and media and content
DRM. It makes things more difficult for paying legit customers and in
fact piracy, especially of songs and movies, seems to have increased and
a lot of these bone headed restrictive schemes are (at least a good
part) to blame.
-saran