As I've said on many occasions, user data should go in real folders with
real names, with no redirection and nothing hidden.
Otherwise, what is a Vista user supposed to do if he/she wants to copy some
stuff across to an Apple, a PC running Linux, a network drive or a mainframe
application?
Vista is totally unsuitable for the management of data that is expected to
survive beyond the next stealth update.
Regards
"Mark L. Ferguson" <> a écrit dans le
message de news:798A488C-C18B-4C09-BCB1-...
> There are a number of 'relic' folders, like 'Documents and Settings', in
> Vista. The new storage area is "C:/Users", and the old path is redirected
> to it. The old folder will seem to exist, and have a shortcut arrow on the
> icon in Explorer. This is by design, and is expected behavior.
> --
> Was this helpful? Then click the Ratings button. Voting helps the web
> interface.
> http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales...eAPostAsAnswer
> Mark L. Ferguson
> .
>
> "Lawrence" <> wrote in message
> news:1753CBC8-8C0A-4958-A9F8-...
>> I have just performed an upgrade from XP to Vista Ultimate. the upgrade
>> ran
>> very smoothly, but I was shocked to find that all of "my Documents" and
>> my
>> "Doumnets and settings" had been deleted, but strangely , my wifes user
>> profile on the same machine was completly intacked. I have tried to use a
>> data recover tool to recover my data which I can still see on the hard
>> drive,
>> but most of it has been over written by the upgrade. Does any body have
>> any
>> idea's what has gone wrong, or if poosible what I could do to recover the
>> data. Microsoft tech support have not been very helpful.
>