Vista Vs XP Performance

This test is showing XP is faster in most tests.

http://www.custompc.co.uk/features/6...-vs-vista.html

"Jeanette" <> wrote in message
news:...
> This test is showing XP is faster in most tests.
>
> http://www.custompc.co.uk/features/6...-vs-vista.html

And Windows 98 runs them faster than Windows XP. And so on.

--
Paul Smith,
Yeovil, UK.
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/
http://www.windowsresource.net/

*Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail*

For the most part the older operating system will perform better on
identical hardware.
Although many have reported better performance with Windows Vista than
Windows XP with a Clean Installation of each.
This is nothing new and the idea is not unique to computers and
operating systems.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Jeanette" <> wrote in message
news:...
> This test is showing XP is faster in most tests.
>
> http://www.custompc.co.uk/features/6...-vs-vista.html

On Oct 22, 1:01 pm, "Jupiter Jones [MVP]"
<jones_jupi...@hotnomail.com> wrote:
> For the most part the older operating system will perform better on
> identical hardware.
> Although many have reported better performance with Windows Vista than
> Windows XP with a Clean Installation of each.
> This is nothing new and the idea is not unique to computers and
> operating systems.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]http://www3.telus.net/dandemarhttp://www.dts-l.org
>
> "Jeanette" <jrus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:...
>
>
>
> > This test is showing XP is faster in most tests.
>
> >http://www.custompc.co.uk/features/6...vs-vista.html- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I like Xp much faster . vista takes to much time to work with and xp
is easter