Water DOES CONDUCT ELECTRICITY

"AlexB" <> wrote in
news::

> This is all very very true and displays an admirable understanding of
> basic physics which is uncommon among our hs graduates who prefer
> cooking classes to physics or math but then choose as a career writing
> "free" software.

It is too far behind now and I am having trouble answering it. It is very
important that my answer was heard.

That is what DanS posted:
"I'm sure you still believe that water itself conducts electricity. It
does not."

"What was said below is basic electricity, not necessarily physics. In HS
I majored in math and electronics, but never touched physics."

My post/answer, this time not topposted (as an exception):

DanS, the fact that you did not take physics in you HS (and even proud of
it) clearly shows. Anyone who did, however, knows that you do not understand
what you are talking about. The PURE WATER, and I repeat, chemically pure
water is an isolator, with dipole molecules as they are and it does not
conduct electricity. We are not talking about a pure evaporate/condensate or
distilled water in here which requires special equipment. We are talking
about water with impurities which are purposely included in drinking water.
Have you, IDIOT, ever heard of chlorine? Its major part is chloride, an ion,
my dear and it changes the physical conductivity of water. In water it
breaks into Cl and H which is proton. This stuff is in every idiot's stomach
but they of course have no idea about it since they never took physics and
are proud of it.

Once you added chlorine to it the dielectric quality of water is gone,
disappears. The water with impurities becomes a low concentration solute and
all solutes of this sort DO CONDUCT ELECTRICITY. It does not take the
chlorine actually to kill an arrogant idiot. The water in any river or a
pond has many soluble cations and anions and they do conduct electricity.

I do not want you, as*ho*le to be hurt but if another idiot wets their hands
and touches a raw electric wire then the consequences may be tragic. This is
because even the purest water on your hands can kill you. You, idiot, may
think that you have a loophole in here, but in fact you don't. Even if you
wet your hands with the purest water in the world the next thing that is
going to happen: it becomes impure because you drop it on you idiotic hands
that never touched a physics textbook.

Your skin that perhaps was very dry with your epithelial level being a good
isolator because it is carotene instantly becomes a very good conductor and
it is because this purest water in the world that you paid a thousand bucks
a pint to do your idiotic experiment soaks the epithelial cells and they
exude (I do not expect you to know this word, of course, but hopefully you
can catch the meaning), yes they exude ions which are there aplenty. Those
ions include potassium, sodium, chloride, sulphate and others. And if any
idiot does it he is as good as dead. Period. Even if you believe that "water
does not conduct electricity," you, idiot who, throws his weight around
challenging people with education and knowledge will be dead as well.

What else shall I add to this lecture? It was very important, because you
are spreading medieval ignorance, my dear and it may cost people lives. You
are a dangerous man, an involuntary commitment might be an option for you.

The last thing I want to add that the static electricity behaves pretty much
the same way I described, So far I was talking about the power grid, etc.
But coulombs in low quantities do accumulate anywhere it there are favorable
conditions. These conditions are predicated on a very dry environment
because it saps water out of you and when you shuffle or rub your idiotic
feet you become electrified. And I do not mean in a good sense because you
cannot do anything "electrifying" even if you are charged with enough static
to kill and idiot. However, no idiot so far as far as I know has ever been
killed by the static because there is not enough of it, an idiot gets a sort
of an advanced warning and somehow discharges it. The best way to discharge
the static is to spray it with what, take a quiz you, idiot? Water, my dear,
water. Some commercial sources want you to believe that their special,
unique, patented solution does the trick much better than simple tap water.
It is pretty much the same when some characters around here are trying to
convince the unsuspected public that their APIs are better than native Vista
APIs.

Was it you idiot who tried to challenge me on the API internals yesterday?
If not you then another idiot must have been there. Or perhaps you have a
double,

The very last thing, For some it is not an issue or it is even a laughing
matter as another idiot indicated yesterday that he quoted that worn out
adage about an unlikely lightning that may strike his computer. If he goes
to Tampa, Fl the "unlikely" may well become "likely" since Tampa is the
World Capital of Lightning. The highest number of thunderstorms is
registered in Tampa area. I am sure that idiot has never been to Tampa or
even never saw a Tampanian in his life because if he did he would have
realized the healthy respect for mother nature is engraved on their faces.

If he is in Tampa and still do not believe me he should stand next to his
computer in a good thunderstorm and wait. No special equipment is necessary.
In no time and with no warning the event will arrive. He does not need to
check his chip if it is still alive. It is surely as good as dead. All he
need to do is to make sure his butt is not in Saratoga.

For people in Northern latitudes, you idiot, static electricity is a daily
and shall I say rather annoying reality. The cold dry weather saps water out
of you and even if you idiot run to your refrigerator to grab another beer
10 min later you are again high and dry.

The moral of the story is: do not take seriously what an idiot like DanS
tells you about static not being dangerous. It is. I won't kill you but if
you neglect physics which DanS refused to take in his HS because he could
not understand it anyway and I assume his math never went higher than
multiplication of numbers with 3 digital places.

Think about it: static can kill your precious motherboard or a video card or
anything with very delicate semiconductors. Again, DanS thinks I am talking
gibberish. I am sure he has never heard of semiconductors, he thinks
computers are made of clover leaves and potato chips.

They say curiosity kills the cat. No, ignorance kills idiots.

"alexB" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> "AlexB" <> wrote in
> news::
>
>> This is all very very true and displays an admirable understanding of
>> basic physics which is uncommon among our hs graduates who prefer
>> cooking classes to physics or math but then choose as a career writing
>> "free" software.
>
> It is too far behind now and I am having trouble answering it. It is very
> important that my answer was heard.
>
> That is what DanS posted:
> "I'm sure you still believe that water itself conducts electricity. It
> does not."
>
> "What was said below is basic electricity, not necessarily physics. In HS
> I majored in math and electronics, but never touched physics."
>
> My post/answer, this time not topposted (as an exception):
>
> DanS, the fact that you did not take physics in you HS (and even proud of
> it) clearly shows. Anyone who did, however, knows that you do not
> understand
> what you are talking about. The PURE WATER, and I repeat, chemically pure
> water is an isolator, with dipole molecules as they are and it does not
> conduct electricity. We are not talking about a pure evaporate/condensate
> or
> distilled water in here which requires special equipment. We are talking
> about water with impurities which are purposely included in drinking
> water.
> Have you, IDIOT, ever heard of chlorine? Its major part is chloride, an
> ion,
> my dear and it changes the physical conductivity of water. In water it
> breaks into Cl and H which is proton. This stuff is in every idiot's
> stomach
> but they of course have no idea about it since they never took physics and
> are proud of it.
>
> Once you added chlorine to it the dielectric quality of water is gone,
> disappears. The water with impurities becomes a low concentration solute
> and
> all solutes of this sort DO CONDUCT ELECTRICITY. It does not take the
> chlorine actually to kill an arrogant idiot. The water in any river or a
> pond has many soluble cations and anions and they do conduct electricity.
>
> I do not want you, as*ho*le to be hurt but if another idiot wets their
> hands
> and touches a raw electric wire then the consequences may be tragic. This
> is
> because even the purest water on your hands can kill you. You, idiot, may
> think that you have a loophole in here, but in fact you don't. Even if you
> wet your hands with the purest water in the world the next thing that is
> going to happen: it becomes impure because you drop it on you idiotic
> hands
> that never touched a physics textbook.
>
> Your skin that perhaps was very dry with your epithelial level being a
> good
> isolator because it is carotene instantly becomes a very good conductor
> and
> it is because this purest water in the world that you paid a thousand
> bucks
> a pint to do your idiotic experiment soaks the epithelial cells and they
> exude (I do not expect you to know this word, of course, but hopefully you
> can catch the meaning), yes they exude ions which are there aplenty. Those
> ions include potassium, sodium, chloride, sulphate and others. And if any
> idiot does it he is as good as dead. Period. Even if you believe that
> "water
> does not conduct electricity," you, idiot who, throws his weight around
> challenging people with education and knowledge will be dead as well.
>
> What else shall I add to this lecture? It was very important, because you
> are spreading medieval ignorance, my dear and it may cost people lives.
> You
> are a dangerous man, an involuntary commitment might be an option for you.
>
> The last thing I want to add that the static electricity behaves pretty
> much
> the same way I described, So far I was talking about the power grid, etc.
> But coulombs in low quantities do accumulate anywhere it there are
> favorable
> conditions. These conditions are predicated on a very dry environment
> because it saps water out of you and when you shuffle or rub your idiotic
> feet you become electrified. And I do not mean in a good sense because you
> cannot do anything "electrifying" even if you are charged with enough
> static
> to kill and idiot. However, no idiot so far as far as I know has ever been
> killed by the static because there is not enough of it, an idiot gets a
> sort
> of an advanced warning and somehow discharges it. The best way to
> discharge
> the static is to spray it with what, take a quiz you, idiot? Water, my
> dear,
> water. Some commercial sources want you to believe that their special,
> unique, patented solution does the trick much better than simple tap
> water.
> It is pretty much the same when some characters around here are trying to
> convince the unsuspected public that their APIs are better than native
> Vista
> APIs.
>
> Was it you idiot who tried to challenge me on the API internals yesterday?
> If not you then another idiot must have been there. Or perhaps you have a
> double,
>
> The very last thing, For some it is not an issue or it is even a laughing
> matter as another idiot indicated yesterday that he quoted that worn out
> adage about an unlikely lightning that may strike his computer. If he goes
> to Tampa, Fl the "unlikely" may well become "likely" since Tampa is the
> World Capital of Lightning. The highest number of thunderstorms is
> registered in Tampa area. I am sure that idiot has never been to Tampa or
> even never saw a Tampanian in his life because if he did he would have
> realized the healthy respect for mother nature is engraved on their faces.
>
> If he is in Tampa and still do not believe me he should stand next to his
> computer in a good thunderstorm and wait. No special equipment is
> necessary.
> In no time and with no warning the event will arrive. He does not need to
> check his chip if it is still alive. It is surely as good as dead. All he
> need to do is to make sure his butt is not in Saratoga.
>
> For people in Northern latitudes, you idiot, static electricity is a daily
> and shall I say rather annoying reality. The cold dry weather saps water
> out
> of you and even if you idiot run to your refrigerator to grab another beer
> 10 min later you are again high and dry.
>
> The moral of the story is: do not take seriously what an idiot like DanS
> tells you about static not being dangerous. It is. I won't kill you but if
> you neglect physics which DanS refused to take in his HS because he could
> not understand it anyway and I assume his math never went higher than
> multiplication of numbers with 3 digital places.
>
> Think about it: static can kill your precious motherboard or a video card
> or
> anything with very delicate semiconductors. Again, DanS thinks I am
> talking
> gibberish. I am sure he has never heard of semiconductors, he thinks
> computers are made of clover leaves and potato chips.
>
> They say curiosity kills the cat. No, ignorance kills idiots.
>


Alex

Could we have the next slide, please?

--
Mike Hall - MVP
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

Sure Mike but not tonight

"Mike Hall - MVP" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> "alexB" <> wrote in message
> Alex
>
> Could we have the next slide, please?
>
> --
> Mike Hall - MVP
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
>
>
>
>

Take a shower and you'll cool down - it will wash away some of those excess
ions / electrons.

--
Jon


"alexB" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> "AlexB" <> wrote in
> news::
>
>> This is all very very true and displays an admirable understanding of
>> basic physics which is uncommon among our hs graduates who prefer
>> cooking classes to physics or math but then choose as a career writing
>> "free" software.
>
> It is too far behind now and I am having trouble answering it. It is very
> important that my answer was heard.
>
> That is what DanS posted:
> "I'm sure you still believe that water itself conducts electricity. It
> does not."
>
> "What was said below is basic electricity, not necessarily physics. In HS
> I majored in math and electronics, but never touched physics."
>
> My post/answer, this time not topposted (as an exception):
>
> DanS, the fact that you did not take physics in you HS (and even proud of
> it) clearly shows. Anyone who did, however, knows that you do not
> understand
> what you are talking about. The PURE WATER, and I repeat, chemically pure
> water is an isolator, with dipole molecules as they are and it does not
> conduct electricity. We are not talking about a pure evaporate/condensate
> or
> distilled water in here which requires special equipment. We are talking
> about water with impurities which are purposely included in drinking
> water.
> Have you, IDIOT, ever heard of chlorine? Its major part is chloride, an
> ion,
> my dear and it changes the physical conductivity of water. In water it
> breaks into Cl and H which is proton. This stuff is in every idiot's
> stomach
> but they of course have no idea about it since they never took physics and
> are proud of it.
>
> Once you added chlorine to it the dielectric quality of water is gone,
> disappears. The water with impurities becomes a low concentration solute
> and
> all solutes of this sort DO CONDUCT ELECTRICITY. It does not take the
> chlorine actually to kill an arrogant idiot. The water in any river or a
> pond has many soluble cations and anions and they do conduct electricity.
>
> I do not want you, as*ho*le to be hurt but if another idiot wets their
> hands
> and touches a raw electric wire then the consequences may be tragic. This
> is
> because even the purest water on your hands can kill you. You, idiot, may
> think that you have a loophole in here, but in fact you don't. Even if you
> wet your hands with the purest water in the world the next thing that is
> going to happen: it becomes impure because you drop it on you idiotic
> hands
> that never touched a physics textbook.
>
> Your skin that perhaps was very dry with your epithelial level being a
> good
> isolator because it is carotene instantly becomes a very good conductor
> and
> it is because this purest water in the world that you paid a thousand
> bucks
> a pint to do your idiotic experiment soaks the epithelial cells and they
> exude (I do not expect you to know this word, of course, but hopefully you
> can catch the meaning), yes they exude ions which are there aplenty. Those
> ions include potassium, sodium, chloride, sulphate and others. And if any
> idiot does it he is as good as dead. Period. Even if you believe that
> "water
> does not conduct electricity," you, idiot who, throws his weight around
> challenging people with education and knowledge will be dead as well.
>
> What else shall I add to this lecture? It was very important, because you
> are spreading medieval ignorance, my dear and it may cost people lives.
> You
> are a dangerous man, an involuntary commitment might be an option for you.
>
> The last thing I want to add that the static electricity behaves pretty
> much
> the same way I described, So far I was talking about the power grid, etc.
> But coulombs in low quantities do accumulate anywhere it there are
> favorable
> conditions. These conditions are predicated on a very dry environment
> because it saps water out of you and when you shuffle or rub your idiotic
> feet you become electrified. And I do not mean in a good sense because you
> cannot do anything "electrifying" even if you are charged with enough
> static
> to kill and idiot. However, no idiot so far as far as I know has ever been
> killed by the static because there is not enough of it, an idiot gets a
> sort
> of an advanced warning and somehow discharges it. The best way to
> discharge
> the static is to spray it with what, take a quiz you, idiot? Water, my
> dear,
> water. Some commercial sources want you to believe that their special,
> unique, patented solution does the trick much better than simple tap
> water.
> It is pretty much the same when some characters around here are trying to
> convince the unsuspected public that their APIs are better than native
> Vista
> APIs.
>
> Was it you idiot who tried to challenge me on the API internals yesterday?
> If not you then another idiot must have been there. Or perhaps you have a
> double,
>
> The very last thing, For some it is not an issue or it is even a laughing
> matter as another idiot indicated yesterday that he quoted that worn out
> adage about an unlikely lightning that may strike his computer. If he goes
> to Tampa, Fl the "unlikely" may well become "likely" since Tampa is the
> World Capital of Lightning. The highest number of thunderstorms is
> registered in Tampa area. I am sure that idiot has never been to Tampa or
> even never saw a Tampanian in his life because if he did he would have
> realized the healthy respect for mother nature is engraved on their faces.
>
> If he is in Tampa and still do not believe me he should stand next to his
> computer in a good thunderstorm and wait. No special equipment is
> necessary.
> In no time and with no warning the event will arrive. He does not need to
> check his chip if it is still alive. It is surely as good as dead. All he
> need to do is to make sure his butt is not in Saratoga.
>
> For people in Northern latitudes, you idiot, static electricity is a daily
> and shall I say rather annoying reality. The cold dry weather saps water
> out
> of you and even if you idiot run to your refrigerator to grab another beer
> 10 min later you are again high and dry.
>
> The moral of the story is: do not take seriously what an idiot like DanS
> tells you about static not being dangerous. It is. I won't kill you but if
> you neglect physics which DanS refused to take in his HS because he could
> not understand it anyway and I assume his math never went higher than
> multiplication of numbers with 3 digital places.
>
> Think about it: static can kill your precious motherboard or a video card
> or
> anything with very delicate semiconductors. Again, DanS thinks I am
> talking
> gibberish. I am sure he has never heard of semiconductors, he thinks
> computers are made of clover leaves and potato chips.
>
> They say curiosity kills the cat. No, ignorance kills idiots.
>

I appreciate the advice but I do it daily anyway. That's why I've never
killed a chip. They do not like unwashed bodies.

"Jon" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> Take a shower and you'll cool down - it will wash away some of those
> excess ions / electrons.
>
> --
> Jon
>
>
> "alexB" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> "AlexB" <> wrote in
>> news::
>>

Just FYI. Maybe you should remove Vista from your computer and install
Ubuntu. Just FYI

"alexB" <> wrote in message
news:eFF$...
>I appreciate the advice but I do it daily anyway. That's why I've never
>killed a chip. They do not like unwashed bodies.
>
> "Jon" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> Take a shower and you'll cool down - it will wash away some of those
>> excess ions / electrons.
>>
>> --
>> Jon
>>
>>
>> "alexB" <> wrote in message
>> news:%...
>>> "AlexB" <> wrote in
>>> news::
>>>
>

Thanks for the offer. I've heard Ubuntu is gaining market at tremendous
rate. 10,000,000 downloads every minute via a dial-up from Africa. Why do
you need another user?

That incredible number I presume is because your server cannot upload more
than 256 bytes per dial-up?

"Spanky deMonkey" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Just FYI. Maybe you should remove Vista from your computer and install
> Ubuntu. Just FYI
>
> "alexB" <> wrote in message
> news:eFF$...
>>I appreciate the advice but I do it daily anyway. That's why I've never
>>killed a chip. They do not like unwashed bodies.
>>
>> "Jon" <> wrote in message
>> news:%...
>>> Take a shower and you'll cool down - it will wash away some of those
>>> excess ions / electrons.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jon
>>>
>>>
>>> "alexB" <> wrote in message
>>> news:%...
>>>> "AlexB" <> wrote in
>>>> news::
>>>>
>>
>

"alexB" <> wrote in
news:#:

> "AlexB" <> wrote in
> news::
>
>> This is all very very true and displays an admirable understanding of
>> basic physics which is uncommon among our hs graduates who prefer
>> cooking classes to physics or math but then choose as a career
>> writing "free" software.
>
> It is too far behind now and I am having trouble answering it. It is
> very important that my answer was heard.

Wrong. It is very important to YOU your answer be heard. Noone else cares.

But first, might I say you wrote a very lengthy reply to my one single
comment about water and electricity, and then added more subjects about
static, and lightening, of which I NEVER commented on, AT ALL, and then
claim to that what I 'said' about them, which was NOTHING, was dangerous to
humans and PCs.

How can you expect anyone to have any faith in what you say, when you plain
outright LIE and make up things about other people ? (And that's on top of
your lackluster track record here.)

Here's a little bit more about me. I've been in the electronics biz since
the early 80's. To be more precise, at several wireless companies. That was
except for 2 years at a machine design facitily designing automated
assembly equipment, mostly for the automotive industry. (Next you'll be
telling me I don't know anything about pneumatics/hydraulics or mechanical
principles I guess.)

I'd give you a link to where I work now, but you would call that out as
spam. I've held every role from simple electronic assembly to Lead Field
Tech during several large state-wide private wireless network deployments,
including working at tower sites. I know all about static electricity, and
electricity in general, and believe me I know about lightening. I've fixed
enough gear that had been hit by lightening to last me a life time. I was
200 feet away from a tower site when I saw one tower get hit with
lightening in the rearview mirror. Five minutes before that I was inside
the building. I heard the thunder, took a quick look outside, and said 'oh
sh*t'. I've spent more than my share of time static-proofing assembly/test
rooms. So yes, I know what I'm talking about.

I have no fear of electricity, since I understand it. Of course, I still
always turn off the breaker when doing anything on a circuit.

Here's the entire contents of my post:
---------------------------------------------------------------
[You]
> This is all very very true and displays an admirable understanding of
> basic physics which is uncommon among our hs graduates who prefer
> cooking classes to physics or math but then choose as a career writing
> "free" software.

I'm sure you still believe that water itself conducts electricity. It
does not.

What was said below is basic electricity, not necessarily physics. In HS
I majored in math and electronics, but never touched physics.
-------------------------------------------------------------------


> That is what DanS posted:
> "I'm sure you still believe that water itself conducts electricity. It
> does not."
>
> "What was said below is basic electricity, not necessarily physics. In
> HS I majored in math and electronics, but never touched physics."
>
> My post/answer, this time not topposted (as an exception):
>
> DanS, the fact that you did not take physics in you HS (and even proud
> of it) clearly shows. Anyone who did, however, knows that you do not

<SNIPPED>

Water, in and by itself does not conduct electricity. Period. That is
EXACTLY what I said. You agreed. So there is nothing wrong with my
statement.

Water alone does not conduct electricity. It is the impurities in the water
that conduct electricity.

I learned this in week 2 of Electronics I in 9th grade.

> What else shall I add to this lecture? It was very important, because
> you are spreading medieval ignorance, my dear and it may cost people
> lives. You are a dangerous man, an involuntary commitment might be an
> option for you.

Dangerous ? Hardly.

<SNIP>

> simple tap water. It is pretty much the same when some characters
> around here are trying to convince the unsuspected public that their
> APIs are better than native Vista APIs.

There you go with the stupid API's thing again. They are programs,
utilities, applications, but NOT API's.

> Was it you idiot who tried to challenge me on the API internals
> yesterday? If not you then another idiot must have been there. Or
> perhaps you have a double,

What did I say about your reading retention problem ?

> The very last thing, For some it is not an issue or it is even a
> laughing matter as another idiot indicated yesterday that he quoted
> that worn out adage about an unlikely lightning that may strike his
> computer. If he goes to Tampa, Fl the "unlikely" may well become
> "likely" since Tampa is the World Capital of Lightning. The highest
> number of thunderstorms is registered in Tampa area. I am sure that
> idiot has never been to Tampa or even never saw a Tampanian in his
> life because if he did he would have realized the healthy respect for
> mother nature is engraved on their faces.

Sorry bonehead, making assumptions again. I've been to Tampa. I went jet-
skiing in the bay with the stingrays even.

> If he is in Tampa and still do not believe me he should stand next to
> his computer in a good thunderstorm and wait. No special equipment is
> necessary. In no time and with no warning the event will arrive. He
> does not need to check his chip if it is still alive. It is surely as
> good as dead. All he need to do is to make sure his butt is not in
> Saratoga.
>
> For people in Northern latitudes, you idiot, static electricity is a
> daily and shall I say rather annoying reality. The cold dry weather
> saps water out of you and even if you idiot run to your refrigerator
> to grab another beer 10 min later you are again high and dry.
>
> The moral of the story is: do not take seriously what an idiot like
> DanS tells you about static not being dangerous.

Which I NEVER said. I NEVER mentioned static electricity at all.

> It is. I won't kill
> you but if you neglect physics which DanS refused to take in his HS
> because he could not understand it anyway and I assume his math never
> went higher than multiplication of numbers with 3 digital places.

Assumptions again. And dumb one's at that.

> Think about it: static can kill your precious motherboard or a video
> card or anything with very delicate semiconductors. Again, DanS thinks
> I am talking gibberish. I am sure he has never heard of
> semiconductors, he thinks computers are made of clover leaves and
> potato chips.
>
> They say curiosity kills the cat. No, ignorance kills idiots.

I'd rather be dead than you.

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:17:27 -0500, DanS
<> wrote:

> "alexB" <> wrote in
> news:#:
>
>> "AlexB" <> wrote in
>> news::
>>
>>> This is all very very true and displays an admirable understanding of
>>> basic physics which is uncommon among our hs graduates who prefer
>>> cooking classes to physics or math but then choose as a career
>>> writing "free" software.
>>
>> It is too far behind now and I am having trouble answering it. It is
>> very important that my answer was heard.
>
> Wrong. It is very important to YOU your answer be heard. Noone else
> cares.
>
> But first, might I say you wrote a very lengthy reply to my one single
> comment about water and electricity, and then added more subjects about
> static, and lightening, of which I NEVER commented on, AT ALL, and then
> claim to that what I 'said' about them, which was NOTHING, was dangerous
> to
> humans and PCs.
>
> How can you expect anyone to have any faith in what you say, when you
> plain
> outright LIE and make up things about other people ? (And that's on top
> of
> your lackluster track record here.)
>
> Here's a little bit more about me. I've been in the electronics biz since
> the early 80's. To be more precise, at several wireless companies. That
> was
> except for 2 years at a machine design facitily designing automated
> assembly equipment, mostly for the automotive industry. (Next you'll be
> telling me I don't know anything about pneumatics/hydraulics or
> mechanical
> principles I guess.)
>
> I'd give you a link to where I work now, but you would call that out as
> spam. I've held every role from simple electronic assembly to Lead Field
> Tech during several large state-wide private wireless network
> deployments,
> including working at tower sites. I know all about static electricity,
> and
> electricity in general, and believe me I know about lightening. I've
> fixed
> enough gear that had been hit by lightening to last me a life time. I was
> 200 feet away from a tower site when I saw one tower get hit with
> lightening in the rearview mirror. Five minutes before that I was inside
> the building. I heard the thunder, took a quick look outside, and said
> 'oh
> sh*t'. I've spent more than my share of time static-proofing
> assembly/test
> rooms. So yes, I know what I'm talking about.
>
> I have no fear of electricity, since I understand it. Of course, I still
> always turn off the breaker when doing anything on a circuit.
>

>
> Water, in and by itself does not conduct electricity. Period. That is
> EXACTLY what I said. You agreed. So there is nothing wrong with my
> statement.
>
> Water alone does not conduct electricity. It is the impurities in the
> water
> that conduct electricity.
>
> I learned this in week 2 of Electronics I in 9th grade.
>
>> What else shall I add to this lecture? It was very important, because
>> you are spreading medieval ignorance, my dear and it may cost people
>> lives. You are a dangerous man, an involuntary commitment might be an
>> option for you.
>
> Dangerous ? Hardly.
> <SNIP>
>
>> simple tap water. It is pretty much the same when some characters
>> around here are trying to convince the unsuspected public that their
>> APIs are better than native Vista APIs.
>
> There you go with the stupid API's thing again. They are programs,
> utilities, applications, but NOT API's.
>
>> Was it you idiot who tried to challenge me on the API internals
>> yesterday? If not you then another idiot must have been there. Or
>> perhaps you have a double,
>
> What did I say about your reading retention problem ?
>
>> The very last thing, For some it is not an issue or it is even a
>> laughing matter as another idiot indicated yesterday that he quoted
>> that worn out adage about an unlikely lightning that may strike his
>> computer. If he goes to Tampa, Fl the "unlikely" may well become
>> "likely" since Tampa is the World Capital of Lightning. The highest
>> number of thunderstorms is registered in Tampa area. I am sure that
>> idiot has never been to Tampa or even never saw a Tampanian in his
>> life because if he did he would have realized the healthy respect for
>> mother nature is engraved on their faces.
>
> Sorry bonehead, making assumptions again. I've been to Tampa. I went jet-
> skiing in the bay with the stingrays even.
>
>> If he is in Tampa and still do not believe me he should stand next to
>> his computer in a good thunderstorm and wait. No special equipment is
>> necessary. In no time and with no warning the event will arrive. He
>> does not need to check his chip if it is still alive. It is surely as
>> good as dead. All he need to do is to make sure his butt is not in
>> Saratoga.
>>
>> For people in Northern latitudes, you idiot, static electricity is a
>> daily and shall I say rather annoying reality. The cold dry weather
>> saps water out of you and even if you idiot run to your refrigerator
>> to grab another beer 10 min later you are again high and dry.
>>
>> The moral of the story is: do not take seriously what an idiot like
>> DanS tells you about static not being dangerous.
>
> Which I NEVER said. I NEVER mentioned static electricity at all.
>
>> It is. I won't kill
>> you but if you neglect physics which DanS refused to take in his HS
>> because he could not understand it anyway and I assume his math never
>> went higher than multiplication of numbers with 3 digital places.
>
> Assumptions again. And dumb one's at that.
>
>> Think about it: static can kill your precious motherboard or a video
>> card or anything with very delicate semiconductors. Again, DanS thinks
>> I am talking gibberish. I am sure he has never heard of
>> semiconductors, he thinks computers are made of clover leaves and
>> potato chips.
>>
>> They say curiosity kills the cat. No, ignorance kills idiots.
>
> I'd rather be dead than you.


LMOA...All this stemmed from a poster who wanted to clean a PCI slot.
This idiot is Adam Albright...I guarentee

forty-nine <> wrote in newsp.t5a5ava3cusnid@xps-ubuntu:


>>> They say curiosity kills the cat. No, ignorance kills idiots.
>>
>> I'd rather be dead than you.
>
>
> LMOA...All this stemmed from a poster who wanted to clean a PCI slot.
> This idiot is Adam Albright...I guarentee

I doubt this is AA.

AA, while very combative with a few indivuduals here, did not come across
like this guy (?). He may have had an ego, but the posting style is
completely wrong to be AA.

Funny thing, I didn't even notice the absence of AA until someone mentioned
him the other day.

phalyxB will be the same. When he's gone, noone will even notice. Same with
me and a lot of people around here.

At least I *know* I'm a disposable part of this group.