Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Update > Why do I need these so-called critical updates

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Why do I need these so-called critical updates

 
 
Will Pittenger
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-20-2006
I see two critical updates that I see no reason for me to waste
bandwidth downloading.

1. Sharepoint patch. I do not have Sharepoint installed. Ditto for
Exchange. My OS is XP Pro rather than Windows Server. So what is it
going to patch?

2. WGA. I have verified my PC is legit. I see no reason to waste
anything on this. In fact, it not only demands that I download it, but
then it expects to run 24/7 (slowing my machine down) and send data back
to Microsoft (consuming more bandwidth).

Perhaps if I had broadband, I would not worry about these updates, but I
currently have to settle for dial-up.
------
Will Pittenger
[will _ pittenger at globespeed dot com]
Send large attachments to [will dot pittenger 1 at gmail dot com]
My homepage (which includes links to all of my sites):
http://will.pittenger1.googlepages.com/home
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Robin Walker [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-20-2006
Will Pittenger <> wrote:

> I see two critical updates that I see no reason for me to waste
> bandwidth downloading.
>
> 1. Sharepoint patch. I do not have Sharepoint installed. Ditto for
> Exchange. My OS is XP Pro rather than Windows Server. So what is it
> going to patch?


Your Microsoft Office installation. Clients for the above can be parts of
Microsoft Office.

--
Robin Walker [MVP Networking]



 
Reply With Quote
 
Stefaan
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-21-2006

"Robin Walker [MVP]" <> schreef in bericht
news:...
> Will Pittenger <> wrote:
>
>> I see two critical updates that I see no reason for me to waste
>> bandwidth downloading.
>>
>> 1. Sharepoint patch. I do not have Sharepoint installed. Ditto for
>> Exchange. My OS is XP Pro rather than Windows Server. So what is it
>> going to patch?

>
> Your Microsoft Office installation. Clients for the above can be parts of
> Microsoft Office.
>
> --
> Robin Walker [MVP Networking]
>



You jut cut the most important part of the OP:
WGA scandalous WGA lies:

http://news.com.com :

---
"Microsoft advanced its antipiracy program in November last year, when it started
pushing out a tool called WGA Notifications alongside its security updates. The tool
has been sent millions of Windows users in a number of countries. In April, the U.S.
joined the list of covered territories, as did the United Kingdom, Malaysia,
Australia and New Zealand.
The first time a computer owner runs WGA to check if their version of Windows is
genuine, the software sends data on the system back to Microsoft. This information
covers the Windows XP product key, the maker of the PC, the operating system version,
PC bios information and the user's local setting and language. Microsoft discloses
that this information is transferred in its WGA tool license.

In past weeks, reports have emerged that the WGA Notifications software connects to a
Microsoft server each time the PC is started--something Microsoft didn't previously
disclose. Also, as it has become clear that the tool isn't a finished product,
millions of Windows users may unwittingly be subjects in a trial run for a Microsoft
antipiracy program.

This has irked some people, even those who have acknowledged Microsoft's right to
fight piracy and who have supported the WGA program in the past. Users shouldn't be
pushed into being guinea pigs, many readers argued.

"I spent several hours trying to fix an office machine which slowed to a crawl or
froze after this update was installed," wrote CNET News.com reader "umbramistweave,"
in response to a story about the prerelease status of WGA Notifications. "It's beta.
It's flawed. It should not have been released as an update."

---



WGA beta: Try explaining why the OP needs this buggy, fake "urgent security update"

You won't be able to, we know.









 
Reply With Quote
 
Will Pittenger
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-22-2006
That is probably why the MVP did not mention WGA.

Stefaan wrote:
>
> "Robin Walker [MVP]" <> schreef in bericht
> news:...
>> Will Pittenger <> wrote:
>>
>>> I see two critical updates that I see no reason for me to waste
>>> bandwidth downloading.
>>>
>>> 1. Sharepoint patch. I do not have Sharepoint installed. Ditto for
>>> Exchange. My OS is XP Pro rather than Windows Server. So what is it
>>> going to patch?

>>
>> Your Microsoft Office installation. Clients for the above can be
>> parts of Microsoft Office.
>>
>> --
>> Robin Walker [MVP Networking]
>>

>
>
> You jut cut the most important part of the OP:
> WGA scandalous WGA lies:
>
> http://news.com.com :
>
> ---
> "Microsoft advanced its antipiracy program in November last year, when
> it started pushing out a tool called WGA Notifications alongside its
> security updates. The tool has been sent millions of Windows users in a
> number of countries. In April, the U.S. joined the list of covered
> territories, as did the United Kingdom, Malaysia, Australia and New
> Zealand.
> The first time a computer owner runs WGA to check if their version of
> Windows is genuine, the software sends data on the system back to
> Microsoft. This information covers the Windows XP product key, the maker
> of the PC, the operating system version, PC bios information and the
> user's local setting and language. Microsoft discloses that this
> information is transferred in its WGA tool license.
>
> In past weeks, reports have emerged that the WGA Notifications software
> connects to a Microsoft server each time the PC is started--something
> Microsoft didn't previously disclose. Also, as it has become clear that
> the tool isn't a finished product, millions of Windows users may
> unwittingly be subjects in a trial run for a Microsoft antipiracy program.
>
> This has irked some people, even those who have acknowledged Microsoft's
> right to fight piracy and who have supported the WGA program in the
> past. Users shouldn't be pushed into being guinea pigs, many readers
> argued.
>
> "I spent several hours trying to fix an office machine which slowed to a
> crawl or froze after this update was installed," wrote CNET News.com
> reader "umbramistweave," in response to a story about the prerelease
> status of WGA Notifications. "It's beta. It's flawed. It should not have
> been released as an update."
>
> ---
>
>
>
> WGA beta: Try explaining why the OP needs this buggy, fake "urgent
> security update"
>
> You won't be able to, we know.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
------
Will Pittenger
[will _ pittenger at globespeed dot com]
Send large attachments to [will dot pittenger 1 at gmail dot com]
My homepage (which includes links to all of my sites):
http://will.pittenger1.googlepages.com/home
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DriverEntry of my NDIS miniport gets called and returns with NDIS_STATUS_SUCCESS, but immdly NDIS_Unload gets called? Praveen Kumar Amritaluru Windows Vista Drivers 1 01-16-2007 08:35 PM
When does IRP cancel routines get called? Will not EvtDeviceReleaseHardware() get called if one of the IRPs is not completed? Praveen Kumar Amritaluru Windows Vista Drivers 0 11-15-2006 09:44 AM
Critical Updates do not seem all that critical if you do not letus download them until a month has gone by after you fix the problem!!!!! Will Pittenger Windows Update 0 06-20-2006 12:52 AM
Windows 98 Critical Updates and June 30th 2006 cut off date. Really going to happen? How critical is this? Nate Goulet Windows Update 3 05-02-2006 03:40 PM
removing windows so called updates JLOZ31 Windows Update 2 04-20-2004 03:21 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59