Tighter security, for one.
"HAL07" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Gordon wrote:
>>
>>
>> "HAL07" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> Mike Brannigan wrote:
>>>> "HAL07" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:...
>>>>> Dear Microsoft, I just wondered why I need Vista in my business?
>>>>>
>>>>> My experiences with Windows Vista in a business environment:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> An environment that you do not specify exactly what it is
>>>>
>>>>> - Loginscripts keep failing, but started somewhat working again after
>>>>> turning off UAC. Well you say we have to modify our group
>>>>> policy/desktop environment? No we would not like to spend more money
>>>>> on a solution that is working perfectly today.
>>>>
>>>> Well if you are not willing to put the time and effort into
>>>> understanding the use of and control of UAC in a corporate managed
>>>> environment then why complain about it not working?
>>>> Personally given the thousands of seat of Vista I have helped deploy in
>>>> corporate environments UAC and login scripts are not an issue.
>>>>
>>>>> - Users get random errors: Explorer.exe seem to crash a lot
>>>>> - A lot of automated program installs do not work.
>>>>
>>>> Were these installs tested and developed for release on the Vista OS or
>>>> did you just take you XP installs and expect them to work ?
>>>>
>>>>> - Users get random black screens when they log on using Remote Desktop
>>>>
>>>> Not something I have seen or experienced
>>>>
>>>>> - Users get random keyboard errors when logging on to their work
>>>>> computer using a second remote desktop through terminal servers
>>>>
>>>> Please explain what you mean by a "second remote desktop through
>>>> terminal servers"? If you mean you RDP to a desktop and then open up
>>>> another RDP session within that one to a TS then you may well encounter
>>>> issues as this is not a common solution and the execution of RDP within
>>>> and RDP may not be a fully supported configuration.
>>>>
>>>>> - Sync Software for our mobile phones have a lot more problems than on
>>>>> XP clients
>>>>
>>>> Is your Synch Software tested on and certified for use on Vista? -
>>>> check with the manufacturer for their support statement on running
>>>> their product on Vista.
>>>> (have you tried running it in compatibility mode?)
>>>>
>>>>> - Users have trouble finding network connections setup and similar
>>>>> elements of Control Panel
>>>>
>>>> Did you train them on the new UI etc ?
>>>> If not then what did you expect?
>>>>
>>>>> - Outlook crashes more often
>>>>
>>>> Again personally not seen
>>>>
>>>>> - Firewall seem to suddenly reset itself and you loose previously
>>>>> added exceptions
>>>>
>>>> Are you using Group Policy to control this ?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But of course, we get a nice GUI. But it seem to bother most people
>>>>> that they get something that they don't feel any interested in. They
>>>>> just want to do their job.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I'm tired of this Vista, we've been running it since December 2007
>>>>> on work. And I got a question from one of my employees:
>>>>> Why did you install Vista? Well, I quite frankly stared at the floor.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -- HAL07, Engineering Services, Norway
>>>>
>>>> You seem to have just deployed Vista without any due dillergence in
>>>> terms, of application compatibility testing, appropriate use of Group
>>>> Policy to control the environment and a lack of end user training.
>>>> I am not surprised your experience has been less then optimal.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I asked a simple question. Why do we need Vista? Yet you answer with
>>> attacking our deployment. I suggest you stick to answering the question.
>>> As far as I can see, Vista does NOT deliver anything useful vs. XP.
>>>
>>> --
>>> -- HAL07, Engineering Services, Norway
>>
>> Um Mike posted many reasons why you might be having these problems. if
>> all you want to do is rant then don't read any of the responses...
>
> But what do you feel Vista give you that XP do not? What do you need,
> business wise?
>
> --
> -- HAL07, Engineering Services, Norway
|