"- Bobb -" <bobb@noemail.123> wrote in
news::
>
> "- Bobb -" <bobb@noemail.123> wrote in message
> news:u$R%...
>> This is the best Microsoft marketing can do ?
>> I got this email:
>> ==================
>>
>> TechNet Flash: Special Edition: Why should you upgrade to Windows
>> Vista?
>>
>> Welcome to the special bonus edition of TechNet Flash featuring
>> content specifically selected to inform and ease your Windows Vista
>> deployment. ....
>>
>> Every 10 PCs that switch to Windows Vista is the equivalent of taking
>> an automobile off the road, in terms of greenhouse gases.
>>
>>
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system...staEnergyConse
>> rv.mspxOH, in that case let me toss my current OS .
>
>
> typo:
> s/b
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system...staEnergyConse
r
> v.mspx
>
All of my XP systems are set to turn off the monitors and disks when
they are idle. (I think monitors default to power off even in XP.)
95% of the article compares how much energy is saved with a monitor
powered off versus not powered off. That doesn't only happen in Vista!
I configured my Windows 95 computers to do the same thing, 14 years ago.
The rest of the info in that article is what I would call "fluff". The
group policy and corporate settings have to be set by someone.
David Walker