"Colin Barnhorst" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> It is related to the WinImage file format from which the Vista image is
> extracted and laid down on your hard drive. Your files, settings, and
> apps are copied to another part of the hard drive first and then only the
> area where Windows is to be installed is wiped. The new image is laid
> down, Windows is installed, drivers are installed, and then the files,
> settings, and apps are reinstalled from the temporary area. It is in this
> sense that the installation of Vista is always a "clean" installation of
> VISTA regardless of whether you choose an Upgrade or Custom installation.
> The old system files are not used in any way.
I wouldn't call this a clean install. A different, possibly better method
to do an upgrade install? Sure
Is there a risk that the installation process might make a mistake?
Definitely. Does this method cut down on those mistakes. Probably
Other wise how do you explain the post with the title
"RC1 Media Center - Unable to Burn DVDs"
Posted 9/29/2006 12:17 at this newsgroup
I can probably find dozens more just like it in just this newsgroup alone if
I really wanted to look
If I was MS I'd give up on calling this a "clean install"
>
> "Leadfoot" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> I've seen some posts saying an upgrade install is actually a clean
>> install. That your disk is wiped clean and then vista rebuilds everything
>> including your 3rd party programs and this is just as good as installing
>> Vista on a clean formatted hard drive.
>>
>> Can someone explain this to me and the rest of the skeptics why this is
>> so? Please be detailed and thorough in your response.
>>
>>
>
>
|