Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Update > Why is WU offering two versions of .NET?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Why is WU offering two versions of .NET?

 
 
John
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-27-2006
I did a fresh install of Windows XP Pro and installed all the critical
updates except for IE7. Then I ran WU again and looked at the optional
updates. It offered to install both .NET Framework 1.1 and .NET
Framework 2.0. I installed 2.0, and the two critical updates that apply
to it. WU is still asking me if I want to install .NET Framework 1.1!
Why? If there is any reason to have both versions installed, I'd like to
know what it is. Thanks!

John
--
Please reply in this newsgroup. I never post my true email address to
prevent spam. Thank you.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
MowGreen [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-27-2006
A program or application that is already installed may need .NET
Framework 1.1 installed to run correctly.

MowGreen [MVP 2003-2007]
===============
*-343-* FDNY
Never Forgotten
===============

John wrote:

> I did a fresh install of Windows XP Pro and installed all the critical
> updates except for IE7. Then I ran WU again and looked at the optional
> updates. It offered to install both .NET Framework 1.1 and .NET
> Framework 2.0. I installed 2.0, and the two critical updates that apply
> to it. WU is still asking me if I want to install .NET Framework 1.1!
> Why? If there is any reason to have both versions installed, I'd like to
> know what it is. Thanks!
>
> John

 
Reply With Quote
 
John
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-27-2006
This was a fresh installation on a re-formatted HD. Nothing other than
the OS had been installed.

John

MowGreen [MVP] wrote:
> A program or application that is already installed may need .NET
> Framework 1.1 installed to run correctly.
>
> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2007]
> ===============
> *-343-* FDNY
> Never Forgotten
> ===============
>
> John wrote:
>
>> I did a fresh install of Windows XP Pro and installed all the critical
>> updates except for IE7. Then I ran WU again and looked at the optional
>> updates. It offered to install both .NET Framework 1.1 and .NET
>> Framework 2.0. I installed 2.0, and the two critical updates that
>> apply to it. WU is still asking me if I want to install .NET Framework
>> 1.1! Why? If there is any reason to have both versions installed, I'd
>> like to know what it is. Thanks!
>>
>> John



--
Please reply in this newsgroup. I never post my true email address to
prevent spam. Thank you.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Jerry
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-27-2006
Versions of .NET Framework are separate - version 2 is not an upgrade to 1.0
or 1.1 - similar to needing Visual Basic runtime 1 and 2 and 3, etc

So, actually you should install .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1 and 2.0 and 3.0

"John" <> wrote in message
news:...
> This was a fresh installation on a re-formatted HD. Nothing other than the
> OS had been installed.
>
> John
>
> MowGreen [MVP] wrote:
>> A program or application that is already installed may need .NET
>> Framework 1.1 installed to run correctly.
>>
>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2007]
>> ===============
>> *-343-* FDNY
>> Never Forgotten
>> ===============
>>
>> John wrote:
>>
>>> I did a fresh install of Windows XP Pro and installed all the critical
>>> updates except for IE7. Then I ran WU again and looked at the optional
>>> updates. It offered to install both .NET Framework 1.1 and .NET
>>> Framework 2.0. I installed 2.0, and the two critical updates that apply
>>> to it. WU is still asking me if I want to install .NET Framework 1.1!
>>> Why? If there is any reason to have both versions installed, I'd like to
>>> know what it is. Thanks!
>>>
>>> John

>
>
> --
> Please reply in this newsgroup. I never post my true email address to
> prevent spam. Thank you.



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RE: Folder Versions has Non Existent List in Previous Versions Tab Sid Windows Vista Performance 0 02-12-2008 06:55 AM
Folder Versions has Non Existent List in Previous Versions Tab Sid Windows Vista Performance 0 02-12-2008 06:14 AM
Offering a part-time job 520520 Windows Vista General Discussion 2 10-20-2007 03:06 PM
Offering Remote Assistance prats Windows Vista General Discussion 3 05-31-2007 04:58 AM
wu keeps offering KB905648 Jim Windows Update 0 11-22-2006 01:53 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59