Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > DNS Server > Win 2003 SP2 DNS resolution problem

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Win 2003 SP2 DNS resolution problem

 
 
David Verschoyle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009

Some of our client machines (Win XP) randomly loose access to a DNS host.

If I repair the network connection on the client machine all seems to be
back to normal again.

All machines get DNS IP from DHCP.
DNS server has two network cards.
AS400NI1 Host (record on DNS server)

Wireshark capture.

26 10.421520 172.16.2.17 172.16.1.2 NBNS Name query NB AS400NI1<00>


27 10.421865 172.16.1.2 172.16.2.17 NBNS Name query response, Requested name
does not exist

28 10.442595 172.16.2.17 172.16.255.255 NBNS Name query NB AS400NI1<00>

Hope someone can help.
Thanks.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009
Hello David,

What do you mean with loose access to DNS host? Please post an unedited ipconfig
/all from a client and the DNS server.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


> Some of our client machines (Win XP) randomly loose access to a DNS
> host.
>
> If I repair the network connection on the client machine all seems to
> be back to normal again.
>
> All machines get DNS IP from DHCP.
> DNS server has two network cards.
> AS400NI1 Host (record on DNS server)
> Wireshark capture.
>
> 26 10.421520 172.16.2.17 172.16.1.2 NBNS Name query NB AS400NI1<00>
>
> 27 10.421865 172.16.1.2 172.16.2.17 NBNS Name query response,
> Requested name does not exist
>
> 28 10.442595 172.16.2.17 172.16.255.255 NBNS Name query NB
> AS400NI1<00>
>
> Hope someone can help.
> Thanks.



 
Reply With Quote
 
David Verschoyle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009

Hi Meinolf,

The client would not be able to telnet to AS400NI1 because it would not be
able to resolve the address. Telnet to IP 172.16.1.1 is fine.

I think what could be happening is that the metrics of the two networks
cards on the server could be switching around.

Client (Is Vista but same problem occurs)

C:\Users\dverschoyle>ipconfig /all

Windows IP Configuration

Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : ittechvista
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : GILLMACMILLAN.IE
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : GILLMACMILLAN.IE

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : gillmacmillan.ie
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) 82566DC Gigabit Network
Connecti
on
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-16-76-B5-A4-1C
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::a0cb:a82a:fc4f:7a11%8(Preferred)
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.2.17(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : 09 July 2009 09:17:02
Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : 17 July 2009 09:17:03
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.5.254
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.2
DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 201332342
DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . :
00-01-00-01-0D-9C-0D-37-00-16-76-B5-A4-1C

DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.2
213.94.190.194
159.134.237.6
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.2
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 4:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for
VMnet
1
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-C0-00-01
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::5829:4a27:dc33:b60f%16(Preferred)
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.189.1(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 352342102
DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . :
00-01-00-01-0D-9C-0D-37-00-16-76-B5-A4-1C

DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::2%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 5:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : VMware Virtual Ethernet Adapter for
VMnet
8
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-50-56-C0-00-08
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::fdcd:3fa0:46a1:c3f3%18(Preferred)
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.234.1(Preferred)
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 385896534
DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . :
00-01-00-01-0D-9C-0D-37-00-16-76-B5-A4-1C

DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : fec0:0:0:ffff::1%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::2%1
fec0:0:0:ffff::3%1
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 6:

Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : gillmacmillan.ie
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : isatap.gillmacmillan.ie
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 7:

Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 02-00-54-55-4E-01
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 13:

Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . :
isatap.{2043CAEE-B2CB-4AD4-A7E2-33FB676C7
886}
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 14:

Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . :
isatap.{AF1F59DC-15B3-4D65-832C-4B7331296
599}
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Server

Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790]
(C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.GILLMAC>ipconfig /all

Windows IP Configuration

Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : BKMAILSERVER
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : GILLMACMILLAN.IE
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : GILLMACMILLAN.IE

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 4:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network
Connection #
2
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-13-72-4E-A3-A1
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.101.1
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.101.254
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 159.134.237.6
159.134.248.17
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.2

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 3:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network Connection
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-13-72-4E-A3-A0
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.2
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.2
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 172.16.1.2

C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.GILLMAC>


"Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:

> Hello David,
>
> What do you mean with loose access to DNS host? Please post an unedited ipconfig
> /all from a client and the DNS server.
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>
> > Some of our client machines (Win XP) randomly loose access to a DNS
> > host.
> >
> > If I repair the network connection on the client machine all seems to
> > be back to normal again.
> >
> > All machines get DNS IP from DHCP.
> > DNS server has two network cards.
> > AS400NI1 Host (record on DNS server)
> > Wireshark capture.
> >
> > 26 10.421520 172.16.2.17 172.16.1.2 NBNS Name query NB AS400NI1<00>
> >
> > 27 10.421865 172.16.1.2 172.16.2.17 NBNS Name query response,
> > Requested name does not exist
> >
> > 28 10.442595 172.16.2.17 172.16.255.255 NBNS Name query NB
> > AS400NI1<00>
> >
> > Hope someone can help.
> > Thanks.

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009
Hello David,

Your big problem is that you use 159.134.237.6, 159.134.248.17 and 213.94.190.194
as DNS server. Domain internal use only the domain DNS server and not the
ISPs DNS server. Configure FORWARDERs on the DNS server properties in the
DNS management console.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


 
Reply With Quote
 
David Verschoyle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009
Meinolf,

We have the following IP's set as DNS fowarders already.

159.134.248.17
193.95.141.60
159.134.237.6

So should I change it so the clients pick up 172.16.1.2 as the only DNS
server from DHCP?

"Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:

> Hello David,
>
> Your big problem is that you use 159.134.237.6, 159.134.248.17 and 213.94.190.194
> as DNS server. Domain internal use only the domain DNS server and not the
> ISPs DNS server. Configure FORWARDERs on the DNS server properties in the
> DNS management console.
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009

Hello David,

Yes, all domain machines must use the domain DNS server. If that one doesn't
know it will forward to the ISP.

Why does your client also use 192.168.x.x addresses? VMs running on it, according
to the adapter name?

Also the DC should not be multihomed, why is that configuration with 192.x.x.x
and 172.x.x.x?

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


> Meinolf,
>
> We have the following IP's set as DNS fowarders already.
>
> 159.134.248.17
> 193.95.141.60
> 159.134.237.6
> So should I change it so the clients pick up 172.16.1.2 as the only
> DNS server from DHCP?
>
> "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:
>
>> Hello David,
>>
>> Your big problem is that you use 159.134.237.6, 159.134.248.17 and
>> 213.94.190.194 as DNS server. Domain internal use only the domain DNS
>> server and not the ISPs DNS server. Configure FORWARDERs on the DNS
>> server properties in the DNS management console.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Meinolf Weber
>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
>> confers
>> no rights.
>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm



 
Reply With Quote
 
David Verschoyle
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009

Meinolf,

192.168.x.x address on local machine is VM's.

Server is currently multihomed because of a couple of internal changes. We
are in the process of changing this.

I think your solution may have solved the problem. I need to do a few more
test to confirm.

"Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:

> Hello David,
>
> Yes, all domain machines must use the domain DNS server. If that one doesn't
> know it will forward to the ISP.
>
> Why does your client also use 192.168.x.x addresses? VMs running on it, according
> to the adapter name?
>
> Also the DC should not be multihomed, why is that configuration with 192.x.x.x
> and 172.x.x.x?
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>
> > Meinolf,
> >
> > We have the following IP's set as DNS fowarders already.
> >
> > 159.134.248.17
> > 193.95.141.60
> > 159.134.237.6
> > So should I change it so the clients pick up 172.16.1.2 as the only
> > DNS server from DHCP?
> >
> > "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:
> >
> >> Hello David,
> >>
> >> Your big problem is that you use 159.134.237.6, 159.134.248.17 and
> >> 213.94.190.194 as DNS server. Domain internal use only the domain DNS
> >> server and not the ISPs DNS server. Configure FORWARDERs on the DNS
> >> server properties in the DNS management console.
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >>
> >> Meinolf Weber
> >> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> >> confers
> >> no rights.
> >> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> >> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm

>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009
Hello David,

You can still have problems with the multihomed server. Make sure it only
register one address in DNS, otherwise clients get problems to resolve the
correct name during logon and also for GPO processing.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


> Meinolf,
>
> 192.168.x.x address on local machine is VM's.
>
> Server is currently multihomed because of a couple of internal
> changes. We are in the process of changing this.
>
> I think your solution may have solved the problem. I need to do a few
> more test to confirm.
>
> "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:
>
>> Hello David,
>>
>> Yes, all domain machines must use the domain DNS server. If that one
>> doesn't know it will forward to the ISP.
>>
>> Why does your client also use 192.168.x.x addresses? VMs running on
>> it, according to the adapter name?
>>
>> Also the DC should not be multihomed, why is that configuration with
>> 192.x.x.x and 172.x.x.x?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Meinolf Weber
>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
>> confers
>> no rights.
>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>>> Meinolf,
>>>
>>> We have the following IP's set as DNS fowarders already.
>>>
>>> 159.134.248.17
>>> 193.95.141.60
>>> 159.134.237.6
>>> So should I change it so the clients pick up 172.16.1.2 as the only
>>> DNS server from DHCP?
>>> "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello David,
>>>>
>>>> Your big problem is that you use 159.134.237.6, 159.134.248.17 and
>>>> 213.94.190.194 as DNS server. Domain internal use only the domain
>>>> DNS server and not the ISPs DNS server. Configure FORWARDERs on the
>>>> DNS server properties in the DNS management console.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Meinolf Weber
>>>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties,
>>>> and
>>>> confers
>>>> no rights.
>>>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
>>>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ace Fekay [Microsoft Certified Trainer]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-09-2009

"David Verschoyle" <> wrote in message news:229D5AD0-8045-474C-B3C7-...
> Meinolf,
>
> 192.168.x.x address on local machine is VM's.
>
> Server is currently multihomed because of a couple of internal changes. We
> are in the process of changing this.
>
> I think your solution may have solved the problem. I need to do a few more
> test to confirm.


I agree, that a DC should never be multihomed. This is due to DNS registration entries. However, if you feel you need to keep it multihomed until you come up with a plan to disable the external NIC, you can alter the DC to force it to work properly for AD and DNS registration. It involves registry and other changes. Please read my following blog on this type of setup to fully understand what is going on and why it's recommended to not be multihomed.

================================================== ================================================== ==
Multihomed DCs, DNS, RRAS servers.
By Ace Fekay, MCSE, MCT
First published: January, 2003, revised accordingly
==============================================

Multihomed DCs WILL cause numerous issues. It's highly recommended to single home all DCs and use a non-DC for the multihoming purposes. If it is the internet gateway, it is recommended to purchase an inexpensive, or cable/DLS router, or even better, a Cisco or similar firewall to perform the task, which if it is compromised by an internet attacker remotely, can further compromise the rest of the internal network.

Also if attempting to use ICS on a DC, this further complicates matters with DC functionality, and cannot be fixed with the following steps outlined in this article.

To explain why will require a little background on AD and DNS:

First, just to get this out of the way, if you have your ISP's DNS addresses in your IP configuration (DCs and clients), they need to be REMOVED. If the ISP's DNS is in there, this will cause additional problems. I usually see errors (GPOs not working, can't find the domain, RPC issues, etc), when the ISP's DNS servers are listed on a client, DCs and/or member servers, or with multihomed DCs. If you have an ISP's (or some other outside DNS server or even using your router as a DNS server) DNS addresses in your IP configuration (all DCs, member servers and clients), they need to be REMOVED and ONLY use the internal DNS server(s). This can be very problematic.

Basically, AD requires DNS. DNS stores AD's resource and service locations in the form of SRV records, hence how everything that is part of the domain will find resources in the domain. If the ISP's DNS is configured in the any of the internal AD member machines' IP properties, (including all client machines and DCs), the machines will be asking the ISP's DNS 'where is the domain controller for my domain?", whenever it needs to perform a function, (such as a logon request, replication request, querying and applying GPOs, etc). Unfortunately, the ISP's DNS does not have that info and they reply with an "I dunno know", and things just fail. Unfortunately, the ISP's (or your router as a DNS server) DNS doesn't have information or records about your internal private AD domain, and they shouldn't have that sort of information.

Also, AD registers certain records in DNS in the form of SRV records that signify AD's resource and service locations. When there are multiple NICs, each NIC registers. IF a client, or another DC queries DNS for this DC, it may get the wrong record. One factor controlling this is Round Robin. If a DC or client on another subnet that the DC is not configured on queries for it, Round Robin will kick in offering one or the other. If the wrong one gets offered, it may not have a route to it. On the other hand, Subnetmask Priortization will ensure a querying client will get an IP that corresponds to the subnet it's on, which will work. To insure everything works, stick with one NIC.

Since this DC is multi-homed, it requires additional configuration to prevent the public interface addresses from being registered in DNS. This creates a problem for internal clients locating AD to authenticate and find other services and resources such as the Global Catalog, file sharing and the SYSVOL DFS share and can cause GPO errors with Userenv 1000 events to be logged, authenticating to shares and printers, logging on takes forever, among numerous other issues.

But if you like, there are some registry changes to eliminate the registration of the external NIC or simply use the internal networking routing to allow access. Here's the whole list of manual steps to follow.

Another problem is the DC now becomes part of two Sites. This is another issue that can be problematic.

But believe me, it's much easier to just get a separate NAT device or multihome a non-DC then having to alter the DC. If the both NICs are internal, I would suggest to pick a subnet, team the NICs and allow your internal routers handle the traffic between subnets - Good luck!

1. Insure that all the NICS only point to your internal DNS server(s) only and none others, such as your ISP’s DNS servers’ IP addresses.

2. In Network & Dialup properties, Advanced Menu item, Advanced Settings, move the internal NIC (the network that AD is on) to the top of the binding order (top of the list).

3. Disable the ability for the outer NIC to register. The procedure, as mentioned, involves identifying the outer NIC’s GUID number. This link will show you how:
246804 - How to Enable-Disable Windows 2000 Dynamic DNS Registrations (per NIC too):
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246804

4. Disable NetBIOS on the outside NIC. That is performed by choosing to disable NetBIOS in IP Properties, Advanced, and you will find that under the “WINS” tab. You may want to look at step #3 in the article to show you how to disable NetBIOS on the RRAS interfaces if this is a RRAS server.
296379 - How to Disable NetBIOS on an Incoming Remote Access Interface [Registry Entry]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=296379

Note: A standard Windows service, called the “Browser service”, provides the list of machines, workgroup and domain names that you see in “My Network Places” (or the legacy term “Network Neighborhood”). The Browser service relies on the NetBIOS service. One major requirement of NetBIOS service is a machine can only have one name to one IP address. It’s sort of a fingerprint. You can’t have two brothers named Darrell. A multihomed machine will cause duplicate name errors on itself because Windows sees itself with the same name in the Browse List (My Network Places), but with different IPs. You can only have one, hence the error generated.

5. Disable the “File and Print Service” and disable the “MS Client Service” on the outer NIC. That is done in NIC properties by unchecking the respective service under the general properties page. If you need these services on the outside NIC (which is unlikely), which allow other machines to connect to your machine for accessing resource on your machine (shared folders, printers, etc.), then you will probably need to keep them enabled.

6. Uncheck “Register this connection” under IP properties, Advanced settings, “DNS” tab.

7. Delete the outer NIC IP address, disable Netlogon registration, and manually create the required records

a. In DNS under the zone name, (your DNS domain name), delete the outer NIC’s IP references for the “LdapIpAddress”. If this is a GC, you will need to delete the GC IP record as well (the “GcIpAddress”). To do that, in the DNS console, under the zone name, you will see the _msdcs folder.

Under that, you will see the _gc folder. To the right, you will see the IP address referencing the GC address. That is called the GcIpAddress. Delete the IP addresses referencing the outer NIC.
i. To stop these two records from registering that information, use the steps provided in the links below:
Private Network Interfaces on a Domain Controller Are Registered in DNS
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328

ii. The one section of the article that disables these records is done with this registry entry:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\Netlogon\Parameters
(Create this Multi-String Value under it):
Registry value: DnsAvoidRegisterRecords
Data type: REG_MULTI_SZ
Values: LdapIpAddress
GcIpAddress

iii. Here is more information on these and other Netlogon Service records:
Restrict the DNS SRV resource records updated by the Netlogon service [including GC]:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/tre...o_rr_in_ad.asp

b. Then you will need to manually create these two records in DNS with the IP addresses that you need for the DC. To create the LdapIpAddress, create a new host under the domain, but leave the “hostname” field blank, and provide the internal IP of the DC, which results in a record that looks like:
(same as parent) A 192.168.5.200 (192.168.5.200 is used for illustrative purposes)

i. You need to also manually create the GcIpAddress as well, if this is a GC. That would be under the _msdcs._gc SRV record under the zone. It is created in the same fashion as the LdapIpAddress mentioned above.

8. In the DNS console, right click the server name, choose properties, then under the “Interfaces” tab, force it only to listen to the internal NIC’s IP address, and not the IP address of the outer NIC.

9. Since this is also a DNS server, the IPs from all NICs will register, even if you tell it not to in the NIC properties. See this to show you how to stop that behavior (this procedure is for Windows 2000, but will also work for Windows 2003):
275554 - The Host's A Record Is Registered in DNS After You Choose Not to Register the Connection's Address:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=275554

10. If you haven't done so, configure a forwarder. You can use 4.2.2.2 if not sure which DNS to forward to until you've got the DNS address of your ISP.
How to set a forwarder? Good question. Depending on your operating system,choose one of the following articles:

300202 - HOW TO: Configure DNS for Internet Access in Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=300202

323380 - HOW TO: Configure DNS for Internet Access in Windows Server 2003 (How to configure a forwarder):
http://support.microsoft.com/d/id?=323380

Active Directory communication fails on multihomed domain controllers
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272294


<==*** Some additional reading ***==>
More links to read up and understand what is going on:

292822 - Name Resolution and Connectivity Issues on Windows 2000 Domain Controller with Routing and Remote Access and DNS Insta {DNS and RRAS and unwanted IPs registering]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=292822

Active Directory communication fails on multihomed domain controllers
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/272294

246804 - How to enable or disable DNS updates in Windows 2000 and in Windows Server 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=246804

295328 - Private Network Interfaces on a Domain Controller Are Registered in DNS [also shows DnsAvoidRegisterRecords LdapIpAddress to avoid reg sameasparent private IP]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=295328

306602 - How to Optimize the Location of a DC or GC That Resides Outside of a Client's Site [Includes info LdapIpAddress and GcIpAddress information and the SRV mnemonic values]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=306602

825036 - Best practices for DNS client settings in Windows 2000 Server and in Windows Server 2003 (including how-to configure a forwarder):
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;825036

291382 - Frequently asked questions about Windows 2000 DNS and Windows Server 2003 DNS
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=291382

296379 - How to Disable NetBIOS on an Incoming Remote Access Interface [Registry Entry]:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=296379

Rid Pool Errors and other multihomed DC errors, and how to configure a multihomed DC, Ace Fekay, 24 Feb 2006
http://www.ureader.com/message/3244572.aspx

257623 257623 Domain Controller's Domain Name System Suffix Does Not Match Domain Name
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=257623
================================================== ================================================== ==


--
Ace

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Please reply back to the newsgroup/forum to benefit from collaboration among responding engineers, as well as to help others benefit from your resolution.

Ace Fekay, MCT, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSA Messaging
Microsoft Certified Trainer

http://twitter.com/acefekay

For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft PSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers.



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible name resolution problem across VPN MrMako DNS Server 1 01-23-2008 02:41 PM
DNS resolution problem Nelson André DNS Server 1 12-20-2005 04:28 PM
Possible problem with DNS name resolution Jo Winchester DNS Server 1 12-10-2005 11:45 AM
Name Resolution Problem on new install of SBS 2003 John Windows Small Business Server 6 04-11-2005 11:55 PM
DNS Name resolution Problem. Nextcert Windows Server 0 11-30-2004 06:35 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59