On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:45:42 -0600, CybrGuy <> wrote:
>On 1/29/2010 3:24 PM, Steve Jain [MVP] wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:14:31 -0600, CybrGuy<> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/29/2010 12:54 PM, Steve Jain [MVP] wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:47:32 -0600, CybrGuy<> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason to believe that Win7 XP mode would be any better at
>>>>> dealing with an XP 32bit driver than Virtualbox or other third party VM
>>>>> on a 64bit system?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have Win7 HP 64bit and I want to use an older Palm Tungsten E with it.
>>>>> There are no 64bit USB drivers for Win7 for this palm from the
>>>>> manufacturer and they don't intend to create any. I tried installing
>>>>> XPP (32) in a VB VM and the palm driver would not install. I was
>>>>> wondering if "XP Mode" in Win7 would be likely to fare better. I would
>>>>> just try it myself, but Win7HP won't run in "XP Mode".
>>>>
>>>> Possibly. All the VM engines are slightly different. You could also
>>>> try VMWare Player 3.
>>>>
>>>> Your HP does not have hardware virtualization?
>>>
>>> By HP I meant "Home Premium", the version of Win7. The box is a Dell
>>> and it does have hardware virtualization, at least according to
>>> "Securable", and it is "locked on".
>>>
>>> There is no 64bit driver for the device, so I was hoping to use the
>>> 32bit VM to connect the device. The driver will not install in the
>>> VirtualBox VM. I was wondering if a different VM, like Win7's XP Mode,
>>> might be able to use the 32bit driver that IS available. My
>>> understanding (or lack) of the bittedness of the OS doesn't help me here.
>>>
>>> So, will the Host's bittedness be the controlling factor, or might the
>>> 32bit VM override?
>>
>> You can use Windows Virtual PC in Home Premium, you just need to
>> install your own XP. XP Mode is just a pre-made VM, it still requires
>> Windows VPC.
>> You can dowlonad Windows VPC here:
>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...9-2545b08e11dd
>>
>
>I appreciate your info, Steve, and I don't mean to be obtuse, but before
>I uninstall the VM I have now and install Microsoft's (which, if I
>understand correctly, doesn't play as well with non-microsoft OSs as
>guests), is there any reason to believe that VPC will be any more likely
>to allow me to use this device. It is the use of this Palm that is
>driving my interest.
A VM is just a container, like a Word document, just a file format.
You can have mulitple virtualization programs on the same computer.
For instance, I have Windows VPC, VM Ware Workstation and Player,
Parallels Desktop 4 Windows, and VirtualBox. All of these programs
have various virtual machines associated with them.
There is no issue with installing Windows VPC and creating your own
Windows XP virtual machine. There's no need to remove your VirtualBox
As long as you don't try to run them concurrently, there are no
issues.
As far as your Palm working better on VPC, I have no idea. Each
virtualization program works differently due to different programming.
--
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/
http://smudj.wordpress.com/