Im 99.9% sure the error has something to do with update KB902400 (its the
only one that updates the ole32.dll file)
I removed this update and I dont get the error anymore...
anyway, here is the error in event view'er
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Application Error
Event Category: None
Event ID: 1000
Date: 17.10.2005
Time: 09:58:01
User: N/A
Computer: MORTENPC
Description:
Faulting application explorer.exe, version 6.0.2900.2180, faulting module
ole32.dll, version 5.1.2600.2726, fault address 0x0005f292.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Data:
0000: 41 70 70 6c 69 63 61 74 Applicat
0008: 69 6f 6e 20 46 61 69 6c ion Fail
0010: 75 72 65 20 20 65 78 70 ure exp
0018: 6c 6f 72 65 72 2e 65 78 lorer.ex
0020: 65 20 36 2e 30 2e 32 39 e 6.0.29
0028: 30 30 2e 32 31 38 30 20 00.2180
0030: 69 6e 20 6f 6c 65 33 32 in ole32
0038: 2e 64 6c 6c 20 35 2e 31 .dll 5.1
0040: 2e 32 36 30 30 2e 32 37 .2600.27
0048: 32 36 20 61 74 20 6f 66 26 at of
0050: 66 73 65 74 20 30 30 30 fset 000
0058: 35 66 32 39 32 0d 0a 5f292..
"Robert Aldwinckle" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> "Morten S" <> wrote in message
> news:4353766b$0$41145$...
>>I installed the 9 new security-updates for XP that came out on the 12th
>> october..
>> after applyting these updates "windows explorer" has crashed several
>> times
>> .. .... for no
>> reason...it justs happens and I cant reproduce the crash in any way.
>> everything was perfect before installing
>>
>> Error signature
>> appname : explorer.exe modname : ole32.dll
>
>
> Please capture the complete Error Signature.
> You select it by dragging your mouse over the text
> (or possibly by doubleclicking on a word and pressing Ctrl-a)
> and then copy it to ClipBoard by pressing Ctrl-c.
>
>
>>
>> I think it might have something to do with the KB902400, because it the
>> only
>> patch that updates ole32.dll
>
>
> Have you tried confirming that all modules in that patch were updated
> correctly? E.g. try using MBSA 1.2.1 and its mbsacli command line
> tool to verify the versions of the modules. (It's not clear to me that
> MBSA 2.0 contains the equivalent function without resorting to scripting.
> E.g. if the newer one is only checking the registry and not the module
> versions it would not be a complete check and more importantly
> for your purposes here it would do nothing to check if a regression
> had occurred.)
>
>
> HTH
>
> Robert Aldwinckle
> ---
>
>
>