"Andre Da Costa" <> wrote in message
news

A2AC05F-A051-4F13-B5B6-...
> Even if it were on another partition and you browse it from within Vista,
> all the same facilities would still be available to you.
But as I stated, not nearly as fast as WPG (which is almost instantaneous),
plus, for Explorer browsing, I like details view for my images. Using it to
search for the right image means I would have to keep changing back and
forth between the views. And did I mention that WPG blows Explorer out of
the water when it comes to searching tags and file names? And thumbnail
loading on start up is instant (Explorer takes forever to load thumbnails,
even small ones).
> If you want more advanced capabilities I would recommend investing in
> something like the latest version of Adobe Photoshop Elements which
> includes the image manager 'Adobe Bridge'.
I've not mentioned that I want 'more advanced capabilities', and I received
Bridge when I installed CS3. I may just have to learn to live with the slow
loading. At least WPG is still its old self once it loads.
Thanks for your suggestions,
Juva
> --
> Best regards,
> Andre Da Costa
> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
>
> "Mikey Juva" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>>
>> "Andre Da Costa" <> wrote in message
>> news:49E30A9C-6077-4740-9B96-...
>>> Use the Pictures explorer. Click Start > Pictures. Same search
>>> facilities and it recognizes file extensions too. 
>>
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. The only problem is that I keep my images on
>> their own partition and not in the Pictures folder. Also, Explorer is
>> much too slow when searching tags, even though my image partition is
>> indexed. In WPG, when you type the beginning letters of the tag, all
>> pertinent tagged images appear immediately.
>>
>> WPG is actually still very fast when loading single images, or after the
>> library is already loaded, but 13 seconds for the initial load is
>> entirely too slow.
>>
>> Thanks again for your comments. Any other suggestions appreciated.
>>
>> Juva
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Andre Da Costa
>>> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
>>>
>>> "Mikey Juva" <> wrote in message
>>> news:#...
>>>> I recently put a 64 bit machine together, and everything is fine except
>>>> that WPG takes too long to load. A synopsis of the issue here:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.vistax64.com/general-disc...ry-slowww.html
>>>>
>>>> At any rate, there doesn't seem to be a solution for this problem, but
>>>> I need a speedy, nimble viewer that also uses WPG's xmp based tagging
>>>> and rating system. This is important because often, while on the phone
>>>> with clients, I need to quickly search for a business image. I have all
>>>> my images tagged, and before installing Vista 64, WPG worked great.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone recommend a viewer that is light, fast and also recognizes
>>>> Vista WPG's rating system (I know that Adobe uses xmp and recognizes
>>>> WPG's tags and ratings, but not light or fast enough)?
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions appreciated,
>>>> Juva
>>>
>>