"PA Bear" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Lars-Erik Østerud wrote:
>> > The price you paid for it
Seems there is tremendous interest in folks
>> > obtaining updates the second Tuesday of the month. That's a good thing.
>> > The not so good thing is that it also appears that the servers can not
>>
>> It's no problem getting them at http://update.microsoft.com
>>
>> Then if that site handles it, why no automatic update tray icon?
>
> Server demand, plain and simple. Millions of Windows users need to install
> the updates and, as MowGreen said, it's physically impossible for everyone
> to do so at once. Be patient: If Automatic Updates hasn't downloaded them
> by say, 15 November, post back.
>
> If you choose to install via Windows Update website, understand that by
> doing so you're pushing all the Automatic Updates users further back in the
> queue (which may explain, at least in part, why Automatic Updates hasn't
> brought them in for you yet).
It's even more than just server demand. It's the /technology/!
Users of Windows Update/Microsoft Update, or users of Automatic Updates who
chose to download updates interactively are downloading in foreground mode,
thus they get 100% of the use of their bandwidth.
Users of Automatic Updates who auto-download, just as users of SUS/WSUS,
download the updates with BITS technology, which uses only "available"
bandwidth, and therefore will take longer to download if the user is busy
doing other things. Also, AU auto-downloads are affected by whether the system
is actually connected. Dialup and PPPoE users will only be able to download
when they are actually -connected- to the Internet.
It's not that anything is being prioritized by Microsoft; it's merely a
function of the choice of technology being used by the end-user to obtain the
updates.