Actually, I'd onsider it a feature and not a bug. Why, you ask
Because if you drag files around an explorer view (of into a view fro
another folder), it implies that you want to customize the arrangemen
of the view because you will be inserting files where you droppped the
onto the list
I find this to be extremely helpful, because I download a lot o
photography on a daily basis. Before I start my downloads, I open th
folder where I want to save the picture and "turn off" sorting b
changing the position of the last item in the list. Then, when
drag-and-drop a picture from Internet Explorer, it appears where I wan
it - at the end of the list where I dropped it. This makes it easier t
see which ones I've already downloaded
Once I am done, I can easily select the last items in the list, an
apply the appropriate tags to the new files. When that is done,
re-initiate sorting
It works slightly differently in XP, but the principle remains th
same. The difference in XP is you could move the icons to just about an
arrangement you wanted, and this created problems for many users.
In Vista, when you re-arrange files in a view, Explorer will keep al
the files in a single consecutive area at the top of the view to preven
a file icon from being hidden out of view. This happens whether you i
Details, Tiles or any other view style of Explorer
Raybo;729905 Wrote:
> It's sad that no one has responded to this question. Some one some wher
> knows the answer but doesn't want to help..
>
> I personally think this is a bug and not a feature
>
> "Raybo" wrote
> > > >
> > > In details view of files, you can drag a file up or down the list
> > an
> > > explorer deselects sorts and you get an unsorted list
> >
> > > This feature is very annoying, as right button dragging to a folde
> > an
> > > selecting move will also deselect sorts as well. This is something
> > do al
> > > day long, and I have to click the name header to re-activate sort
> > afte
> > > every file I move or copy
> >
> > > Why does explorer have this unsorted ability
> >
> > > Can it be disabled and act like XP
> >
> > > This one bug is making the use of Vista a pain in the butt, and th
> > onl
> > > reason I'm using Vista is the Dell machine I have can't get Gigabi
> > speed an
> > > network addapter when this machine runs XP. We tried 3 differen
> > brands o
> > > Gigabit networks cards, and they only get 100Mb speed on a Gigabi
> > network, >
--
Dzomlij
Peter Alexander Dzomlij
-Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And a
you die, so shall I be Reborn...
_*Prometheus*
MOBO: ASUS MB-M3A32-MVP Deluxe/WiFi-A
CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Qua
RAM: 2 x A-Data 2GB DDR2-80
GPU: ASUS ATI Radeon HD 2400PRO, 256M
BOX: Thermaltake Tai-Chi Water Coole
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x6
'' (
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=333562)'[image
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/333562.png]
(
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/333562.png)