Windows XP Significantly Outperforms Vista, Tests Show

http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975

From the article:

"Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."

The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.

Alias

"Alias" <> wrote in message news:fihrb5$703$...
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact, XP
> proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>
> Alias

Old news, we all know that XP is faster than Vista. Now go play with
Ubuntu.

"kevpan158" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> "Alias" <> wrote in message
> news:fihrb5$703$...
>> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>>
>> From the article:
>>
>> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
>> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
>> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>>
>> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Old news, we all know that XP is faster than Vista. Now go play with
> Ubuntu.
>
Surely you mean Iberius Sickus Mugabe :-)

Alias wrote:
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>
> Alias

Yawn.
Frank

kevpan158 wrote:
> "Alias" <> wrote in message news:fihrb5$703$...
>> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>>
>> From the article:
>>
>> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
>> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact, XP
>> proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>>
>> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Old news, we all know that XP is faster than Vista.

Yet you pay good money for Vista. It boggles the mind.

> Now go play with
> Ubuntu.

I am. Can't read headers?

Alias

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>>
>> From the article:
>>
>> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
>> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In
>> fact, XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the
>> tests."
>>
>> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Yawn.
> Frank

Waiting for Vista to finally finish a job and getting bored, are ya?

Alias

"Alias" <> wrote in message news:fihs9b$a6q$...
> kevpan158 wrote:
>> "Alias" <> wrote in message
>> news:fihrb5$703$...
>>> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>>>
>>> From the article:
>>>
>>> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
>>> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
>>> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>>>
>>> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> Old news, we all know that XP is faster than Vista.
>
> Yet you pay good money for Vista. It boggles the mind.
>
>> Now go play with Ubuntu.
>
> I am. Can't read headers?

OK, now go outside and stay away from the computer. Just FYI. You are
annoying. Just FYI

>
> Alias

Alias wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>>>
>>> From the article:
>>>
>>> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
>>> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In
>>> fact, XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the
>>> tests."
>>>
>>> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Yawn.
>> Frank
>
>
> Waiting for Vista to finally finish a job and getting bored, are ya?
>
> Alias

Only a fukkin linux loser like you would think (well, try to) that one
test on one laptop constitutes a defining moment.
Anyway, what's it to a fukkin linux lying loser like you anyway?
Your MS hate cup is already running over with hatred.
You're one really pathetic loser.
Frank

This has been posted already. You probably should relay this message in the
appropriate NG Windows XP General preferrably.
--
Andre
Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
My Vista Quickstart Guide:
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
"Alias" <> wrote in message news:fihrb5$703$...
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact, XP
> proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>
> Alias

"Alias" <> wrote in message news:fihrb5$703$...
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact, XP
> proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> The Vista Virus: the Win Me of NT.
>
> Alias

DOS 6.2 trounced Windows XP in file copy test.
DUMP Windows and try DOS6.2 FYI.