Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Windows XP - Vista Network

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Windows XP - Vista Network

 
 
zsmi
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-21-2009


I have a home network consisting of a desktop computer with Windows XP SP3
and a laptop with Vista Premium SP2 (Hebrew version).
There is no problem to transfer files from the laptop (Vista) to the
desktop computer (XP) but when I try to transfer files from the desktop
(XP) to the laptop (Vista), I receive the following message:
.....the PC is not accessible, you might not have permission to use this
network resource...etc.etc."
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
zsmi

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Canuck57
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-21-2009
zsmi wrote:
>
>
> I have a home network consisting of a desktop computer with Windows XP
> SP3 and a laptop with Vista Premium SP2 (Hebrew version).
> There is no problem to transfer files from the laptop (Vista) to the
> desktop computer (XP) but when I try to transfer files from the desktop
> (XP) to the laptop (Vista), I receive the following message:
> ....the PC is not accessible, you might not have permission to use this
> network resource...etc.etc."
> Any help will be greatly appreciated.
> zsmi


I have no problems doing it. But you have to do it insecurely. Just
export as a wide open share and map a drive.

It is also slow, Vista is slow over the network. Don't expect to
utilize 100BT to it's max, Vista throttles network traffic internally,
not allowing one process to fully utilize the bandwidth. The TCP/IP
stack is brain dead. They do this as if Vista could use it all,
everything else suffers. You can show nicely how Vista/Win 7 does this
by switching between 100BT and 1000BT and monitoring the network
utilization. Vista will always keep it 25 ot 50% of the available
resources.

I suspect disk copy works this way, and why it is so damned slow. It
isn't like Linux or UNIX that will allow 100% use of resources and load
share when two operations need the sam resource. I suspect Microsoft
did this as message passing kernals suck in contention situations. 100%
pre-emptive is where it is at which needs a Mac, Linux or UNIX.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two problems resulting from failed dual boot install lysander Windows Vista Installation 6 03-03-2010 01:26 AM
I also have an error 646 in Windows update. Please help. Jose Windows Update 12 01-09-2010 01:00 PM
Run Vista legally for at least one year/ Vista Activation doesn't stop Piracy Chad Harris Windows Vista Installation 56 12-25-2008 01:34 PM
Installer Issue Jimbo Windows Vista Installation 4 08-15-2007 02:06 PM
dual boot xp and vista...with vista recovery dvd VS Windows Vista Installation 16 05-05-2007 11:05 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59