WinXP SP3 Yields Performance Gains Over Vista SP1 Again

vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS

see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
the naysaers will drop dead eventually...

http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again

exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original OfficeBench
test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system. Unfortunately the
outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the previous score. One can
argue that Windows XP system requirements are quite a bit lower than its
successor, and thats probably got a lot to do with it. This, coupled with
claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on performance but will in fact be
all about stability and reliability instead, doesn't offer much hope for
those people on older systems.

Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at all.
I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick that is
used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the test with
that scenario.

Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
Windows Vista, enjoy!

This has been posted in here numerous times now, just do a search before
hitting the send button.
--
Andre
Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
My Vista Quickstart Guide:
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
"thai bear" <> wrote in message
news:...
> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS
>
> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...
>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>
> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>
> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
> test with that scenario.
>
> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>
>

I would assume you are getting used to seeing things again and again and
again and again...
UAC has given you lots of practice on that



Ï "Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
news:%...
> This has been posted in here numerous times now, just do a search before
> hitting the send button.
> --
> Andre
> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
> "thai bear" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS
>>
>> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
>> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...
>>
>> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>>
>> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
>> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
>> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
>> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
>> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
>> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
>> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
>> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>>
>> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
>> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
>> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
>> test with that scenario.
>>
>> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
>> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>>
>>
>
>

The test was rigged. They didn't run Office 2007 on XP which would have
screwed up the result they so desperately wanted.

On the subject of desperation, how has your day been?

--
Mike Hall - MVP
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




"thai bear" <> wrote in message
news:...
>I would assume you are getting used to seeing things again and again and
>again and again...
> UAC has given you lots of practice on that
>
>
>
> Ï "Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
> news:%...
>> This has been posted in here numerous times now, just do a search before
>> hitting the send button.
>> --
>> Andre
>> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
>> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
>> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
>> "thai bear" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS
>>>
>>> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
>>> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...
>>>
>>> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>>>
>>> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
>>> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
>>> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
>>> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
>>> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
>>> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
>>> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
>>> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>>>
>>> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
>>> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
>>> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
>>> test with that scenario.
>>>
>>> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
>>> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

"thai bear" <> wrote in message
news:...
>I would assume you are getting used to seeing things again and again and
>again and again...
> UAC has given you lots of practice on that
>
>

I would assume that you are used to being a mental retard.. Again and Again
and Again. You have made sure of that.

Just FYI
>
> Ï "Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <> Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
> news:%...
>> This has been posted in here numerous times now, just do a search before
>> hitting the send button.
>> --
>> Andre
>> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
>> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
>> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
>> "thai bear" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS
>>>
>>> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
>>> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...
>>>
>>> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>>>
>>> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
>>> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
>>> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
>>> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
>>> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
>>> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
>>> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
>>> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>>>
>>> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
>>> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
>>> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
>>> test with that scenario.
>>>
>>> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
>>> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

"thai bear" <> wrote in message
news:...
> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS

You have it all wrong. You are bad and slow. You are the ultimate crap
douche bag. Hope you understand now. Just FYI

Just FYI

>
> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...
>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>
> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>
> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
> test with that scenario.
>
> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>
>

"thai bear" <> wrote in message
news:...
> vista is bad and slow... its the ultimate crap OS
>
> see this page for a comaprisson chart between xp sp3 and vista sp1....
> the naysaers will drop dead eventually...

Maybe You Should Drop Dead. The naysayers will rejoice. Just FYI.. Just
FYI
>
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/1...ista-sp1-again
>
> exo.blog has at the request of their members re-run the original
> OfficeBench test, this time with 2GB of RAM in the test system.
> Unfortunately the outcome is unchanged bar a 4% improvement on the
> previous score. One can argue that Windows XP system requirements are
> quite a bit lower than its successor, and thats probably got a lot to do
> with it. This, coupled with claims that Vista SP1 will not improve on
> performance but will in fact be all about stability and reliability
> instead, doesn't offer much hope for those people on older systems.
>
> Make of it what you will, I personally don't have performance issues at
> all. I use Vista with 2GB of RAM and I have a Sandisk 2GB memory stick
> that is used for the "Ready Boost" feature, maybe they should re-run the
> test with that scenario.
>
> Chris Pirillo had this to say on all those negative articles surrounding
> Windows Vista, enjoy!
>
>