Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Live Messenger > WLM doesn't unmap UPnP ports on exit

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

WLM doesn't unmap UPnP ports on exit

 
 
Oscar
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-23-2007
After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my router
is full with WLM UPnP rules, often same ports again and again, I get the
feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very well. Is this a common problem or is
it my specific router (DI-624) that doesn't handle WLM although other
applications work well with it.

I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to delete
the portmapping but my router doesn't get it.

// This doesn't work
This is how WLM does it:
POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
SOAPACTION:
"urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"

<s:Envelope
xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
<s:Body>
<ueletePortMapping
xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
<NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
<NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
<NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
</ueletePortMapping>
</s:Body>
</s:Envelope>



// This works
This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network
connections/Internet gateway in Windows.

POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
SOAPAction:
"urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
Content-Length: 605
Connection: Keep-Alive
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
<meletePortMapping
xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
<NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
<NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
<NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
</meletePortMapping>
</SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jonathan Kay [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-24-2007
Greetings Oscar,

Which version of Messenger is this? This was supposed to be fixed in Windows Live Messenger
8.5.

--
Jonathan Kay
Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
Associate Expert
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/
Messenger Resources - http://messenger.jonathankay.com
All posts unless otherwise specified are (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay.
You *must* contact me for redistribution rights.
--


"Oscar" <> wrote in message
news:...
> After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my router is full with WLM
> UPnP rules, often same ports again and again, I get the feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very
> well. Is this a common problem or is it my specific router (DI-624) that doesn't handle WLM
> although other applications work well with it.
>
> I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to delete the portmapping but
> my router doesn't get it.
>
> // This doesn't work
> This is how WLM does it:
> POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
> HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
> CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
> CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
> SOAPACTION: "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>
> <s:Envelope
> xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
> <s:Body>
> <ueletePortMapping xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
> <NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
> <NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
> <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
> </ueletePortMapping>
> </s:Body>
> </s:Envelope>
>
>
>
> // This works
> This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network connections/Internet gateway
> in Windows.
>
> POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
> Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
> SOAPAction: "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
> User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
> Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
> Content-Length: 605
> Connection: Keep-Alive
> Cache-Control: no-cache
> Pragma: no-cache
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
> SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
> <SOAP-ENV:Body>
> <meletePortMapping xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
> <NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
> dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
> <NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
> dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
> <NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
> dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
> </meletePortMapping>
> </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Oscar
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-24-2007
Hi, this is with WLM 8.5.1302.1018 on Windows XP SP2.

> Greetings Oscar,
>
> Which version of Messenger is this? This was supposed to be fixed in Windows Live Messenger
> 8.5.
>
> -- Jonathan Kay Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger Associate Expert http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ Messenger Resources - http://messenger.jonathankay.com All posts unless otherwise specified are (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay. You *must* contact me for redistribution rights. -- "Oscar" <> wrote in message news:...
>> > After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my router is full with WLM
>> > UPnP rules, often same ports again and again, I get the feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very
>> > well. Is this a common problem or is it my specific router (DI-624) that doesn't handle WLM
>> > although other applications work well with it.
>> >
>> > I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to delete the portmapping but
>> > my router doesn't get it.
>> >
>> > // This doesn't work
>> > This is how WLM does it:
>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>> > HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
>> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
>> > CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>> > SOAPACTION: "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>> >
>> > <s:Envelope
>> > xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>> > s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>> > <s:Body>
>> > <ueletePortMapping xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>> > <NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
>> > <NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
>> > <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
>> > </ueletePortMapping>
>> > </s:Body>
>> > </s:Envelope>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > // This works
>> > This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network connections/Internet gateway
>> > in Windows.
>> >
>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>> > Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>> > SOAPAction: "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>> > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
>> > Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
>> > Content-Length: 605
>> > Connection: Keep-Alive
>> > Cache-Control: no-cache
>> > Pragma: no-cache
>> >
>> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
>> > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>> > SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>> > <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>> > <meletePortMapping xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>> > <NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>> > dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
>> > <NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>> > dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
>> > <NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>> > dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
>> > </meletePortMapping>
>> > </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Jason Tsang
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-24-2007
You might want to see if there is an updated firmware version for your Dlink
di-624.

--
Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP

Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
(and other topics that interest me)
http://jtsang.blogspot.com

More information by me
http://jtsang.mvps.org
http://www.classicsunveiled.com

Find out about the MS MVP Program -
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx



"Oscar" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hi, this is with WLM 8.5.1302.1018 on Windows XP SP2.
>
>> Greetings Oscar,
>>
>> Which version of Messenger is this? This was supposed to be fixed in
>> Windows Live Messenger 8.5.
>>
>> -- Jonathan Kay Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN
>> Messenger/Windows Messenger Associate Expert
>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ Messenger Resources -
>> http://messenger.jonathankay.com All posts unless otherwise specified are
>> (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay. You *must* contact me for redistribution
>> rights. -- "Oscar" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> > After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my router
>>> > is full with WLM UPnP rules, often same ports again and again, I get
>>> > the feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very well. Is this a common problem
>>> > or is it my specific router (DI-624) that doesn't handle WLM although
>>> > other applications work well with it.
>>> >
>>> > I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to delete
>>> > the portmapping but my router doesn't get it.
>>> >
>>> > // This doesn't work
>>> > This is how WLM does it:
>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>> > HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
>>> > CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>> > SOAPACTION:
>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>> >
>>> > <s:Envelope
>>> > xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>> > s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>> > <s:Body>
>>> > <ueletePortMapping
>>> > xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>> > <NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
>>> > <NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
>>> > <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
>>> > </ueletePortMapping>
>>> > </s:Body>
>>> > </s:Envelope>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > // This works
>>> > This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network
>>> > connections/Internet gateway in Windows.
>>> >
>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>> > Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>> > SOAPAction:
>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>> > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
>>> > Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>> > Content-Length: 605
>>> > Connection: Keep-Alive
>>> > Cache-Control: no-cache
>>> > Pragma: no-cache
>>> >
>>> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
>>> > xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>> > SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>> > <meletePortMapping
>>> > xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>> > <NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>> > dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
>>> > <NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>> > dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
>>> > <NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>> > dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
>>> > </meletePortMapping>
>>> > </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

>>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Panta345
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-24-2007
Hi,

I have uPnP enabled and the router is working perfectly for more than 2
years in a row.

I am using this (the best and latest available one) firmware for the DI-624:
http://rapidshare.com/files/78864044..._2006.zip.html

Kind regards,
P.


"Jason Tsang" <jason-> wrote in message
news:#...
> You might want to see if there is an updated firmware version for your
> Dlink di-624.
>
> --
> Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP
>
> Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
> (and other topics that interest me)
> http://jtsang.blogspot.com
>
> More information by me
> http://jtsang.mvps.org
> http://www.classicsunveiled.com
>
> Find out about the MS MVP Program -
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>
>
>
> "Oscar" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Hi, this is with WLM 8.5.1302.1018 on Windows XP SP2.
>>
>>> Greetings Oscar,
>>>
>>> Which version of Messenger is this? This was supposed to be fixed in
>>> Windows Live Messenger 8.5.
>>>
>>> -- Jonathan Kay Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN
>>> Messenger/Windows Messenger Associate Expert
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ Messenger Resources -
>>> http://messenger.jonathankay.com All posts unless otherwise specified
>>> are (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay. You *must* contact me for redistribution
>>> rights. -- "Oscar" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>> > After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my
>>>> > router is full with WLM UPnP rules, often same ports again and again,
>>>> > I get the feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very well. Is this a common
>>>> > problem or is it my specific router (DI-624) that doesn't handle WLM
>>>> > although other applications work well with it.
>>>> >
>>>> > I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to
>>>> > delete the portmapping but my router doesn't get it.
>>>> >
>>>> > // This doesn't work
>>>> > This is how WLM does it:
>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>> > HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
>>>> > CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>> > SOAPACTION:
>>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>> >
>>>> > <s:Envelope
>>>> > xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>>> > s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>> > <s:Body>
>>>> > <ueletePortMapping
>>>> > xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>> > <NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
>>>> > <NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>> > <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>> > </ueletePortMapping>
>>>> > </s:Body>
>>>> > </s:Envelope>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > // This works
>>>> > This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network
>>>> > connections/Internet gateway in Windows.
>>>> >
>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>> > Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>> > SOAPAction:
>>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>> > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
>>>> > Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>> > Content-Length: 605
>>>> > Connection: Keep-Alive
>>>> > Cache-Control: no-cache
>>>> > Pragma: no-cache
>>>> >
>>>> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
>>>> > xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>>> > SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>> > <meletePortMapping
>>>> > xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>> > <NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>> > dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
>>>> > <NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>> > dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>> > <NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>> > dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>> > </meletePortMapping>
>>>> > </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>>>

>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Jason Tsang
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-24-2007
Keep in mind that there are different revisions of the di-624, so if anyone
is looking to update their firmware for that router, check the revision...
the file that Panta345 linked to is for the Rev C version of the router
only.

--
Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP

Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
(and other topics that interest me)
http://jtsang.blogspot.com

More information by me
http://jtsang.mvps.org
http://www.classicsunveiled.com

Find out about the MS MVP Program -
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx



"Panta345" <> wrote in message
news:A7055926-0521-4D96-A781-...
> Hi,
>
> I have uPnP enabled and the router is working perfectly for more than 2
> years in a row.
>
> I am using this (the best and latest available one) firmware for the
> DI-624:
> http://rapidshare.com/files/78864044..._2006.zip.html
>
> Kind regards,
> P.
>
>
> "Jason Tsang" <jason-> wrote in message
> news:#...
>> You might want to see if there is an updated firmware version for your
>> Dlink di-624.
>>
>> --
>> Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP
>>
>> Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
>> (and other topics that interest me)
>> http://jtsang.blogspot.com
>>
>> More information by me
>> http://jtsang.mvps.org
>> http://www.classicsunveiled.com
>>
>> Find out about the MS MVP Program -
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>>
>>
>>
>> "Oscar" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> Hi, this is with WLM 8.5.1302.1018 on Windows XP SP2.
>>>
>>>> Greetings Oscar,
>>>>
>>>> Which version of Messenger is this? This was supposed to be fixed in
>>>> Windows Live Messenger 8.5.
>>>>
>>>> -- Jonathan Kay Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN
>>>> Messenger/Windows Messenger Associate Expert
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ Messenger Resources -
>>>> http://messenger.jonathankay.com All posts unless otherwise specified
>>>> are (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay. You *must* contact me for redistribution
>>>> rights. -- "Oscar" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:...
>>>>> > After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my
>>>>> > router is full with WLM UPnP rules, often same ports again and
>>>>> > again, I get the feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very well. Is this a
>>>>> > common problem or is it my specific router (DI-624) that doesn't
>>>>> > handle WLM although other applications work well with it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to
>>>>> > delete the portmapping but my router doesn't get it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > // This doesn't work
>>>>> > This is how WLM does it:
>>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>>> > HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>>> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
>>>>> > CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>>> > SOAPACTION:
>>>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>>> >
>>>>> > <s:Envelope
>>>>> > xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>>>> > s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>>> > <s:Body>
>>>>> > <ueletePortMapping
>>>>> > xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>>> > <NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
>>>>> > <NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>>> > <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>>> > </ueletePortMapping>
>>>>> > </s:Body>
>>>>> > </s:Envelope>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > // This works
>>>>> > This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network
>>>>> > connections/Internet gateway in Windows.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>>> > Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>>> > SOAPAction:
>>>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>>> > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
>>>>> > Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>>> > Content-Length: 605
>>>>> > Connection: Keep-Alive
>>>>> > Cache-Control: no-cache
>>>>> > Pragma: no-cache
>>>>> >
>>>>> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
>>>>> > xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>>>> > SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>>> > <meletePortMapping
>>>>> > xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>>> > <NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>>> > dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
>>>>> > <NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>>> > dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>>> > <NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>>> > dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>>> > </meletePortMapping>
>>>>> > </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>>>>

>>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Panta345
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-24-2007
Good point Jason Tsang.

FYI The DI-624 Revision Identification Guide:
http://support.dlink.com/products/DI624.asp


Regards,
P.

"Jason Tsang" <jason-> wrote in message
news:...
> Keep in mind that there are different revisions of the di-624, so if
> anyone is looking to update their firmware for that router, check the
> revision... the file that Panta345 linked to is for the Rev C version of
> the router only.
>
> --
> Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP
>
> Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
> (and other topics that interest me)
> http://jtsang.blogspot.com
>
> More information by me
> http://jtsang.mvps.org
> http://www.classicsunveiled.com
>
> Find out about the MS MVP Program -
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>
>
>
> "Panta345" <> wrote in message
> news:A7055926-0521-4D96-A781-...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have uPnP enabled and the router is working perfectly for more than 2
>> years in a row.
>>
>> I am using this (the best and latest available one) firmware for the
>> DI-624:
>> http://rapidshare.com/files/78864044..._2006.zip.html
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> P.
>>
>>
>> "Jason Tsang" <jason-> wrote in message
>> news:#...
>>> You might want to see if there is an updated firmware version for your
>>> Dlink di-624.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP
>>>
>>> Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
>>> (and other topics that interest me)
>>> http://jtsang.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> More information by me
>>> http://jtsang.mvps.org
>>> http://www.classicsunveiled.com
>>>
>>> Find out about the MS MVP Program -
>>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Oscar" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>> Hi, this is with WLM 8.5.1302.1018 on Windows XP SP2.
>>>>
>>>>> Greetings Oscar,
>>>>>
>>>>> Which version of Messenger is this? This was supposed to be fixed in
>>>>> Windows Live Messenger 8.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Jonathan Kay Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN
>>>>> Messenger/Windows Messenger Associate Expert
>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ Messenger Resources -
>>>>> http://messenger.jonathankay.com All posts unless otherwise specified
>>>>> are (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay. You *must* contact me for redistribution
>>>>> rights. -- "Oscar" <> wrote in message
>>>>> news:...
>>>>>> > After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my
>>>>>> > router is full with WLM UPnP rules, often same ports again and
>>>>>> > again, I get the feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very well. Is this
>>>>>> > a common problem or is it my specific router (DI-624) that doesn't
>>>>>> > handle WLM although other applications work well with it.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to
>>>>>> > delete the portmapping but my router doesn't get it.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > // This doesn't work
>>>>>> > This is how WLM does it:
>>>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>>>> > HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>>>> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
>>>>>> > CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>>>> > SOAPACTION:
>>>>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <s:Envelope
>>>>>> > xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>>>>> > s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>>>> > <s:Body>
>>>>>> > <ueletePortMapping
>>>>>> > xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>>>> > <NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
>>>>>> > <NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>>>> > <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>>>> > </ueletePortMapping>
>>>>>> > </s:Body>
>>>>>> > </s:Envelope>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > // This works
>>>>>> > This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network
>>>>>> > connections/Internet gateway in Windows.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>>>> > Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>>>> > SOAPAction:
>>>>>> > "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>>>> > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
>>>>>> > Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>>>> > Content-Length: 605
>>>>>> > Connection: Keep-Alive
>>>>>> > Cache-Control: no-cache
>>>>>> > Pragma: no-cache
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
>>>>>> > xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>>>>> > SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>>>> > <meletePortMapping
>>>>>> > xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>>>> > <NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>>>> > dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
>>>>>> > <NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>>>> > dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>>>> > <NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>>>> > dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>>>> > </meletePortMapping>
>>>>>> > </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>>>>>
>>>

>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Oscar
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      12-24-2007
Hi, I was running the 2.76 version downloaded from the US D-Link site,
my DI-624 is a rev C.

Tools/firmware says:
Current Firmware Version: 2.76
Firmware Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006


Now I downloaded the one from the German D-Link site.
"2.76b05 Aktuelle Firmware Rev.C und H in Englisch 09-08-2006"
And now it says:
Current Firmware Version: 2.76
Firmware Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006

And with the new but older(Wed, 9 Aug 2006) version WLM successfully
unmaps it's ports on exit , I verified this by reinstalling the (Thu,
24 Aug 2006) version from the US site and the problem returned.

So basically I guess that one i broken...

My test i very simple, start WLM and see if a messenger entry appears in
the Advanced/Firewall list in the router. Shutdown WLM and see if the
entry disappears.

Oh well now it seems to work so thank you


Panta345 wrote:
> Good point Jason Tsang.
>
> FYI The DI-624 Revision Identification Guide:
> http://support.dlink.com/products/DI624.asp
>
>
> Regards,
> P.
>
> "Jason Tsang" <jason-> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Keep in mind that there are different revisions of the di-624, so if
>> anyone is looking to update their firmware for that router, check the
>> revision... the file that Panta345 linked to is for the Rev C version
>> of the router only.
>>
>> --
>> Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP
>>
>> Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
>> (and other topics that interest me)
>> http://jtsang.blogspot.com
>>
>> More information by me
>> http://jtsang.mvps.org
>> http://www.classicsunveiled.com
>>
>> Find out about the MS MVP Program -
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>>
>>
>>
>> "Panta345" <> wrote in message
>> news:A7055926-0521-4D96-A781-...
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have uPnP enabled and the router is working perfectly for more than
>>> 2 years in a row.
>>>
>>> I am using this (the best and latest available one) firmware for the
>>> DI-624:
>>> http://rapidshare.com/files/78864044..._2006.zip.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> P.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jason Tsang" <jason-> wrote in message
>>> news:#...
>>>> You might want to see if there is an updated firmware version for
>>>> your Dlink di-624.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jason Tsang - Microsoft MVP
>>>>
>>>> Read my blog for the latest in Media Center topics
>>>> (and other topics that interest me)
>>>> http://jtsang.blogspot.com
>>>>
>>>> More information by me
>>>> http://jtsang.mvps.org
>>>> http://www.classicsunveiled.com
>>>>
>>>> Find out about the MS MVP Program -
>>>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Oscar" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:...
>>>>> Hi, this is with WLM 8.5.1302.1018 on Windows XP SP2.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Greetings Oscar,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which version of Messenger is this? This was supposed to be fixed
>>>>>> in Windows Live Messenger 8.5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Jonathan Kay Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN
>>>>>> Messenger/Windows Messenger Associate Expert
>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ Messenger Resources
>>>>>> - http://messenger.jonathankay.com All posts unless otherwise
>>>>>> specified are (c) 2007 Jonathan Kay. You *must* contact me for
>>>>>> redistribution rights. -- "Oscar" <> wrote
>>>>>> in message news:...
>>>>>>> > After a couple of startups of WLM the firewall rules list in my
>>>>>>> > router is full with WLM UPnP rules, often same ports again and
>>>>>>> > again, I get the feeling that WLM doesn't unmap very well. Is
>>>>>>> this > a common problem or is it my specific router (DI-624) that
>>>>>>> doesn't > handle WLM although other applications work well with it.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I did some wiresharking and it actually looks like WLM tries to
>>>>>>> > delete the portmapping but my router doesn't get it.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > // This doesn't work
>>>>>>> > This is how WLM does it:
>>>>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>>>>> > HOST: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>>>>> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 415
>>>>>>> > CONTENT-TYPE: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>>>>> > SOAPACTION: >
>>>>>>> "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > <s:Envelope
>>>>>>> > xmlns:s="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>>>>>>> > s:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>>>>> > <s:Body>
>>>>>>> > <ueletePortMapping >
>>>>>>> xmlns:u="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>>>>> > <NewRemoteHost></NewRemoteHost>
>>>>>>> > <NewExternalPort>11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>>>>> > <NewProtocol>TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>>>>> > </ueletePortMapping>
>>>>>>> > </s:Body>
>>>>>>> > </s:Envelope>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > // This works
>>>>>>> > This is how it looks when I delete the portmapping via Network
>>>>>>> > connections/Internet gateway in Windows.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > POST /WANIPConnection HTTP/1.1
>>>>>>> > Content-Type: text/xml; charset="utf-8"
>>>>>>> > SOAPAction: >
>>>>>>> "urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1#DeletePortMapping"
>>>>>>> > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; UPnP/1.0; Windows 9x)
>>>>>>> > Host: 192.168.0.1:5678
>>>>>>> > Content-Length: 605
>>>>>>> > Connection: Keep-Alive
>>>>>>> > Cache-Control: no-cache
>>>>>>> > Pragma: no-cache
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
>>>>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope >
>>>>>>> xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" >
>>>>>>> SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
>>>>>>> > <SOAP-ENV:Body>
>>>>>>> > <meletePortMapping >
>>>>>>> xmlns:m="urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANIPConnection:1">
>>>>>>> > <NewRemoteHost xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes" >
>>>>>>> dt:dt="string"></NewRemoteHost>
>>>>>>> > <NewExternalPort xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes"
>>>>>>> > dt:dt="ui2">11775</NewExternalPort>
>>>>>>> > <NewProtocol xmlns:dt="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:datatypes" >
>>>>>>> dt:dt="string">TCP</NewProtocol>
>>>>>>> > </meletePortMapping>
>>>>>>> > </SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
>>>>>>
>>>>

>>
>>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Split Tokens? - Network Shares - red X's, map/unmap Julian Windows Vista Networking 6 12-27-2007 07:15 AM
Re: UPNP works for everything but Messenger - even though it makes entries in the UPNP settings fine... and it worked before... Jonathan Kay [MVP] Windows MSN Messenger 3 04-29-2007 03:19 AM
Which ports when uPnP is not enabled? Egbert Nierop \(MVP for IIS\) Windows Live Messenger 5 07-14-2006 04:17 PM
clearing files on exit and lock up on exit of IE7 cowanathaslettx@hotmail.com Internet Explorer 3 02-08-2006 07:57 AM
I'm curious about the UPnP functionality in MSN Messenger.– How can one tell what UPnP actions are automatically transpiring behind the scenes? Stan Shankman Windows MSN Messenger 1 08-20-2005 06:59 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59