"Pete Murray" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:00:26 -0400, "Robert Aldwinckle"
> <> wrote:
>
>>(cross-post added to WSUS)
>>
>>
>>Since the resolution occurred on the WSUS server
>>I guess it would have helped to have been posting there earlier.
>>I was just trying to help you get some diagnostics on the client side.
>>
>
> As the other client machine had updated perfectly normally, I didn't
> think there was a WSUS problem and assumed the issue had to lie on
> the client side. These boxes aren't perfect replicas (desktop vs
> laptop) and it seems natural to assume some intrinsic difference
> might have caused the problem. In the end, it just came down to a
> matter of timing, I guess. Only after researching the actual
> history of these updates did I see the originals had had a short
> lifespan on the server before being replaced - after that, it all
> clicked into place.
>
>>I still wonder if a verbose log would have given you any better clues
>>than that ambiguous error code. ; )
>
> You mean there is a _more_ detailed log than the update one I
> (reluctantly) posted?
Supposedly. ; )
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902093
<quote>
How to enable extended logging
Microsoft Product Support Services may ask you to turn on verbose logging.
To turn on verbose logging, add the following registry key with two values:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\WindowsUpdate\Trace
Value name: Flags
Value type: REG_DWORD
Value data: 00000007
Value name: Level
Value type: REG_DWORD
Value data: 00000004
This registry key turns on an extended tracing to the %systemroot%\Windowsupdate.log file.
Additionally, this registry key turns on an extended tracing to any attached debuggers.
</quote>
As I noted I find the supplementary information provided by a ProcMon trace
especially useful for trying to decipher what the log messages are really implying... <eg>
>
>>
>>Thanks for sharing your solution.
>>
>
> It only seemed fair to do so, in the hope that someone else might
> avoid the three days of serious hair damage.
: )
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pete
You're welcome.
Robert
---