XP is faster & better than the crap Vista

http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975

From the article:

"Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."

Vista is stupid (TM)

I guess you are stuck inside, Mommy won't let you out to play so you just
keep posting all the negatives about Vista. You don't like Vista, then
migrate to Ubuntu. Just FYI

"Tiberius" <123@321.12> wrote in message
news:...
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> Vista is stupid (TM)
>

Tiberius wrote:
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> Vista is stupid (TM)
>
>
Hey bozo. That article was already posted.
Get a fukkin life you dickhead loser.
Frank

"Tiberius" <123@321.12> wrote in message
news:...
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> Vista is stupid (TM)
>

No links to the actual data or absolute test results, no details of the
test, the configuration of the machines or anything.
No real data at all.

P*** poor journalism and contains no real evidence.

"Tiberius" <123@321.12> wrote in message
news:...
> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>
> From the article:
>
> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>
> Vista is stupid (TM)
>

No links to the actual data or absolute test results, no details of the
test, the configuration of the machines or anything.
No real data at all.

P*** poor journalism and contains no real evidence.

Oh and there is little point in reposting articles and links that someone
else already sis to this group nearly 2 hours before you did.
see
From: Alias <>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
Subject: Windows XP Significantly Outperforms Vista, Tests Show

--

Mike Brannigan

"Vista User" <> wrote in message
news:fii21m$tq7$...
>
> "Tiberius" <123@321.12> wrote in message
> news:...
>> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>>
>> From the article:
>>
>> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
>> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
>> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>>
>> Vista is stupid (TM)
>>
>
> No links to the actual data or absolute test results, no details of the
> test, the configuration of the machines or anything.
> No real data at all.
>
> P*** poor journalism and contains no real evidence.

Actually his brain isn't developed enough to provide any evidence or
results.


>
>
>

"Vista User" <> wrote in message
news:fii21m$tq7$...
>
> "Tiberius" <123@321.12> wrote in message
> news:...
>> http://informationweek.com/news/show...leID=204203975
>>
>> From the article:
>>
>> "Windows XP trounced Windows Vista in all tests -- regardless of the
>> versions used or the amount of memory running on the computer. In fact,
>> XP proved to be roughly twice as fast as Vista in most of the tests."
>>
>> Vista is stupid (TM)
>>
>
> No links to the actual data or absolute test results, no details of the
> test, the configuration of the machines or anything.
> No real data at all.
>
> P*** poor journalism and contains no real evidence.
>
>
>

If you are going to copy my posts have the good grace to at least
acknowledge your source.
--

Mike Brannigan