Gordon's Doctor wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <> wrote in message
> news:hasc7q$8vi$...
>> PerryFeral wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:01:01 -0700, atharsagri
>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't understand y Ubuntu is being discussed here when it is
>>>> Microsoft software discussion group. Request to all, NOT to
>>>> entertain Ubontu here.
>>>
>>> I fully agree with you. However, the reason the handful of ubuntu
>>> users annoy us here is because ubuntu is a toy operating system which
>>> is worth its price. Zero. If ubuntu wasn't so inferior they'd actually
>>> use it for something productive. All it's good for is for simple tasks
>>> like texting in newsgroups. That's why they spend all day every day
>>> doing it. I actually feel sorry for them. They're jealous because they
>>> can't afford a real OS like Windows or Mac. Every few weeks we get a
>>> respite from them for a day or so, because
>>> they get all excited about the next latest and greatest distro. When
>>> they realize that once again it's as useless as the previous million
>>> distros, they're back here again to repeat the process.
>>
>> The nymshifter shifted his nym but not his lies and FUD.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Sorry ****TARD. That reply was not from me. HA HA HA HA - You really
> are stupid.
He posts like you, speaking of "stupid".
>
> He is right.
No, he isn't.
>
> Ubuntu is worth exactly what you pay for it: NOTHING.
How would you know? You've never done a proper evaluation.
Alias
>
>
>
|