2 Unexpected Pitfalls When Installing Vista

Discussion in 'Windows Vista Installation' started by E Pericoloso Sporgersi, Jan 20, 2008.

  1. and How To Rescue Yourself From Them

    Pitfall 1.

    On my brand-new portable with 2 internal SATA HDD's I wanted to install
    Vista with the same partition structure as on my XP desktop computer (also
    with 2 internal HDD's, actually 2 Raid 0 SATA pairs), namely:
    HDD 1: partitions C:, D:, E: and F:
    HDD 2: partitions G: and H:
    Provided I installed all applications and data files to the corresponding
    partitions, this would allow me to copy my desktop's environment variables,
    shortcuts and scripts (batch files) without having to worry about paths.

    To my surprise, after Vista's installation finish, I got:
    HDD 1: C:, E:, F:, and G:
    HDD 2: D: and H:

    Now the configuration I wanted required D: to be on HDD 1 and G: on HDD 2.

    Fortunately I noticed it in time and used Disk Management to reassign the
    correct drive letters. Part 2 will describe why this is so important to me.

    Pitfall 2.

    Ever since Windows 98 I've had 2 HDD's in my consecutive desktop computers.
    Hoping to gain some speed I always installed Windows on HDD 1 partition C:
    and the swapfile (pagefile.sys) and TEMP folder on HDD 2 partition G: (all
    caches and temporary files stored there). This also kept the images of my
    system partition C: a bit smaller, not having to include a relatively large
    swapfile. I also assume this divides the load on the HDD's somewhat more
    equitably. (I've had HDD's die on me, but always the first HDD, never the
    second one).
    This configuration always worked fine up to Windows XP Pro SP2.

    I wanted to do the same with my Vista portable, but then things went wrong.
    With the swapfile on a partition other than the system partition C:, Vista's
    sleep and hibernation options didn't work any more, but made the computer
    freeze with a black screen, requiring a forced power down and a cold boot to
    recover. Moreover, the start menu shut down button and the physical power
    button did shut down Vista, but did NOT power down the computer. To actually
    power down the machine, I had to keep the power button depressed for 5
    A start menu restart always worked as expected, but of course a hot reboot
    does not require a power down.

    I'm glad to report the rescue proved to be easy. Vista appears to require a
    minimal swapfile in its system root. So I configured it to have:
    on HDD 1 C: a swapfile of 128 MB (128 MB might not be enough for you, YMMV)
    on HDD 2 G: a second 4GB swapfile

    Problems solved. But to Microsoft I would suggest Vista's setup to give more
    control over the partition structure, and Vista to give more elaborate
    warning about the issues of not having a token swapfile in Vista's root.
    E Pericoloso Sporgersi
    "It is dangerous to lean out!" [of Windows]
    XP or Vista? A polyglot''''s efficient solution: Vista for my portable and
    XP for my desktop!

    This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
    suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
    Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
    link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
    click "I Agree" in the message pane.

    E Pericoloso Sporgersi, Jan 20, 2008
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.