Approve Updates window

Discussion in 'Update Services' started by Nigel Jett, May 25, 2007.

  1. Nigel Jett

    Nigel Jett Guest

    Anyone know why the Approve Updates window organizes the groups in such
    a strange way? It's not alphabetical, it's not based on the order the
    groups were created in. It doesn't make any sense.
     
    Nigel Jett, May 25, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. It's a top-secret algorithm we invented.. or a bug that we didn't find until
    too late. The order is based on the database's order, so it should remain
    consistent even if it is nonsensical. Sorry for the inconvenience.

    Thanks
    Kris
     
    Kris Owens \(MSFT\), May 29, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Nigel Jett

    Nigel Jett Guest

    Any idea what the chances are of it getting fixed in the near-term?
    I have a lot of groups so it feels like a lot of my time is spent
    scrolling through that list. It would be so nice if my Alpha tester
    group showed up at the top and my Beta tester group showed up right
    below Alpha. Instead Alpha is almost at the very bottom and Beta is
    buried somewhere in the middle.
     
    Nigel Jett, May 30, 2007
    #3
  4. It's something we're considering for an SP1 release, but I can't guarantee
    it'll make it in unfortunately.

    Thanks
    Kris
     
    Kris Owens \(MSFT\), May 30, 2007
    #4
  5. Nigel Jett

    Wade Godfrey Guest

    Let me chime in my support for fixing this ASAP. I have buildings
    connected via T1's and have to stagger the group approvals so as not to
    saturate the links and it would be SO much easier if they were
    alphabetized.

    What are the possibilities of creating a script to fix the database and
    put the groups in alphabetical order?
     
    Wade Godfrey, May 30, 2007
    #5
  6. Wade.. I would think that if the BITS policies were appropriately configured
    it would be impossible to saturate a T-1 link!

    While I'm all in favor of fixing the issue, let's not justify the actions
    based on something that can be fixed in more appropriate ways. :)


    --
    Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCTS, MCP
    Independent WSUS Evangelist
    MVP-Software Distribution (2005-2007)
    https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile=30E00990-8F1D-4774-BD62-D095EB07B36E

    Everything you need for WSUS is at
    http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/technologies/featured/wsus/default.mspx

    And, almost everything else is at
    http://wsusinfo.onsitechsolutions.com
    .....
     
    Lawrence Garvin \(MVP\), May 31, 2007
    #6
  7. Nigel Jett

    Wade Godfrey Guest

    Point taken, but that is not my only reasoning for the change. I'd much
    rather see the groups alphabetized as it was in 2.0.
     
    Wade Godfrey, May 31, 2007
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.