Do Automatic Updates still use svchost? Please use a separate proc

Discussion in 'Windows Vista Security' started by BillD, May 28, 2006.

  1. BillD

    BillD Guest

    In Windows XP SP2 automatic updates are delivered using svchost.exe, but this
    is not good, because if you give the outgoing permission to this svchost.exe
    in your firewall, then every process hosted by this svchost.exe is able to
    communicate with Internet and so maliciuous programs can advantage of this
    lack. Many users disable the automatic updates due this unsafe behavior.
    I hope in Windows XP SP3 the automatic updates and the windows updates are
    delivered using a separate and dedicated process (example:
    automaticupdate.exe) so an user is much more trustful to authorize only this
    in own firewall.
     
    BillD, May 28, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. To some extent, it'll need to use the svchost.exe as it's the Generic Host
    Process for all Win32 stuff. But I do see your point though.

    --
    Zack Whittaker
    » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
    » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
    » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
    » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
    rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
    of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
    that up!

    --: Original message follows :--
     
    Zack Whittaker, May 28, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.