Does Virtual Memory(paging file not in system HD) or ReadyBoost have better performance?

Discussion in 'Windows Vista General Discussion' started by Elliot, May 12, 2007.

  1. Elliot

    Elliot Guest

    They are assumed to have the same capacity.
     
    Elliot, May 12, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Elliot

    AJR Guest

    ReadyBoost is an "aid" to Superfetch the page-filing utility.
    It's effectiveness depends mainly upon two things -1. the type HD - if the
    Windows Experince index for the HD is "5" or higher ReadyBoost does not
    increase performance - if index lower, as usually for laptops, Readyboost
    helps 2. ReadyBoost increases performance when non-sequential read/writes
    are involved - HD more effective for sequential stuff.

    Also a ReadyBoost cache is included by Superfetch whether or not an external
    memory device is attached.

    Data sent to readyboost cannot be accessed normally (explorer, etc.) - the
    data is encrypted and are copies of data stored by Superfetch which is why
    the device can be removed without loss of data.

    Another function of ReadyBoost is to monitor data access over time and
    improve Vista starup time.
     
    AJR, May 12, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Elliot

    Rock Guest

    Rock, May 12, 2007
    #3
  4. Elliot

    Elliot Guest

    Very detailed. Thanks for your answer.


     
    Elliot, May 14, 2007
    #4
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.