Internet Explorer 7 vs. Firefox 2.0 vs. Opera 9 vs. Safari 3.0

Discussion in 'Windows Vista General Discussion' started by S4 hangar 7, Jun 13, 2007.

  1. S4 hangar 7

    S4 hangar 7 Guest

    1. Advertisements

  2. S4 hangar 7

    DX Guest

    and ?
    DX, Jun 13, 2007
    1. Advertisements

  3. S4 hangar 7

    Wilf Guest

    Wow, Apple compares performance of browsers and finds that theirs is the
    best. And they go on to praise safari. Such an objective assessment is
    really useful.

    I have it on good authority that the current incarnation of Safari
    actually has rather a lot of bugs. Oh dear, Apple forgot to mention that.
    Wilf, Jun 13, 2007
  4. S4 hangar 7

    john Guest

    that's true, but it's also about as useful as Vista sales figures from
    john, Jun 13, 2007
  5. So the article says "Apple has compared the performances of Internet
    Explorer 7, Firefox 2.0 and Opera 9 to its own browser transitioned to
    Windows Vista and Windows XP and has concluded that Safari is top dog."

    Is anyone surprised by this? Firefox says their browser is best when
    compared to others. Opera says their browser is best when compared to
    others. Microsoft says their browser is best when compared to others.
    For Apple to say anything less about Safari would have been something
    worth mentioning. This is not.
    Tom Porterfield, Jun 13, 2007
  6. S4 hangar 7

    S4 hangar 18 Guest

    I installed safari... looks good for a beta... and Im sure apple will do its
    best to not make a fool of it self...

    it has a reputation it must keep, on of top quality products...

    (if it crashes in vista you might need to run it in XPSP2 compatibility
    S4 hangar 18, Jun 13, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.