Nero Burning ROM updated to v7.10.1.0

Discussion in 'Windows 64 Bit' started by Carlos, Jul 5, 2007.

  1. Carlos

    Jane C Guest

    Jane C, Jul 8, 2007
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Carlos

    Carlos Guest

    Charlie:
    That sounded like Biff in "Back to the future".
    :)
    Carlos

     
    Carlos, Jul 8, 2007
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 8, 2007
    #23
  4. Thanks, Jane. I'll check it out.
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 8, 2007
    #24
  5. Carlos

    Carlos Guest

    And that one sounded like T'ealc on Stargate SG-1!!!
    :)
    Live long and prosper (Spock, some time in the future)
    Carlos
     
    Carlos, Jul 8, 2007
    #25
  6. Carlos

    Carlos Guest

    Charlie:
    I have not checked 0.43.1.
    I disregarded 0.43.0 when it rejected burning one ISO image that Nero could
    burn very easily.
    Anyway, for just three megs d/l and no cost, I think it is worth a follow up
    on this software.
    I regularly check its web page so rest assure that if there are any news
    everyone in this NG will know.
    Alex Feinman's ISO recorder (http://isorecorder.alexfeinman.com/Vista.htm)
    is still the lightest, and easiest, way to burn ISO's to CD/DVD.
    I wonder why he didn't release a final version yet.
    Going back to Nero... well, I just install the Burning thing and Showtime (I
    like it for viewing dvd's and the ac3 filter it installs for Dolby 5.1)
    I even have a script for removing Nero Scout (regsvr32 /u "C:\Program
    Files\Common Files\Ahead\Lib\MediaLibraryNSE.dll") because there is no option
    to install/uninstall it.

    Carlos
     
    Carlos, Jul 8, 2007
    #26
  7. Carlos

    Carlos Guest

    Oops! The Nero Scout script removal should address the Program Files (x86)
    folder.
    Carlos
     
    Carlos, Jul 8, 2007
    #27
  8. Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 8, 2007
    #28
  9. I like Alex's software, but without the ability to do a verify pass, I'm not
    comfortable with it. In the old CD days, it wasn't that big an issue, but
    we're definitely seeing far more bad burns these days.
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 8, 2007
    #29
  10. Hey, Carlos. If you don't mind, ping me offline when you have a moment.
    Remove the anti-bot text from this address, or send to my main one - c h a r
    l i e A T s c r i b e s DOT c o m.

    Thanks.
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 8, 2007
    #30
  11. Carlos

    Carlos Guest

    No problem.
    Sent you an e-mail half an hour ago.
    Carlos
     
    Carlos, Jul 8, 2007
    #31
  12. Pardon, if I'm being off target - but wouldn't this be a pertinent job for a
    'script'?

    Comparing the data for the varying use you'll need may be a tall order, but
    it's a one time effort when nobody else cared to do it!

    (???)


    Tony. . .
     
    Tony Sperling, Jul 8, 2007
    #32
  13. got it. You have incoming. ;)
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 9, 2007
    #33
  14. Hmm. Certainly possible. At the most basic level, a simple CRC check of the
    disk v. the ISO would be a good starting point.
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 9, 2007
    #34
  15. CRC, I imagine, would do fine if you set up more or less random jobs, like
    targeted back-up's and perhaps build some sort of temporary log file. For
    ISO's you often have the benefit of a MD5 checksum that comes along with it,
    or there's a command-line utility from here:

    http://www.fourmilab.ch/md5/

    or many other places, to create your own. So, if Alex's small wonder has a
    command-line interface to convey source and target directories, you could be
    smiling?


    Tony. . .
     
    Tony Sperling, Jul 9, 2007
    #35
  16. no command line, I don't think? Not sure, now that I go to actually write
    that. I seem to recall he did have one for the CD version, at least. Not
    sure if it made the move to Vista and DVD...
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 9, 2007
    #36
  17. Strictly speaking, I don't think you really need it to do that - it could
    possibly open avenues to more uses with less effort if it did. Most Windows
    programs do have a standard command-line parser built-in that is never
    documented, but the ISORecorder is unusual in many ways and Alex could've
    possible removed the functionality to keep it small, but it would be more
    work to set it up that way I think.


    Tony. . .

    (Oh, and Good Luck!)
     
    Tony Sperling, Jul 9, 2007
    #37
  18. Gary J. Dikkema, Jul 14, 2007
    #38
  19. Gary -
    I like Alex's stuff, and I've used his isorecorder for years. But it
    doesn't do a verify pass - and these days, with some of the things we're
    seeing, that's a necessary requirement. (This was covered earlier in the
    thread. )
     
    Charlie Russel - MVP, Jul 16, 2007
    #39
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.