netstat 0.0.0.0:80

Discussion in 'Server Networking' started by Justwhatingtoknow, Nov 3, 2004.

  1. I have a question about how netstat displays the netstat -na results. On
    some server w2k/2wk3 I do a netstat -na I see that port 80 is displayed as
    0.0.0.0:80 and on other systems it show as the acutal ip... ie 12.12.12.12:80.
    This occurs even if IIS is set the same way. Where is the difference coming
    from. Where does netstat actually get is info... from the registry?
    Thanks in advanced.
     
    Justwhatingtoknow, Nov 3, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. "Justwhatingtoknow" <> wrote in
    message news:...
    >I have a question about how netstat displays the netstat -na results. On
    > some server w2k/2wk3 I do a netstat -na I see that port 80 is displayed as
    > 0.0.0.0:80 and on other systems it show as the acutal ip... ie
    > 12.12.12.12:80.
    > This occurs even if IIS is set the same way. Where is the difference
    > coming
    > from. Where does netstat actually get is info... from the registry?
    > Thanks in advanced.


    0.0.0.0 means it's listening on all interfaces. Maybe not waht you want.
    MS now has a port query tool and a parser to view the results. Also
    sysinternals has tcpview. I like tcpview becuase it's graphical.

    Matt
    MCT, MCSE
     
    Matt Anderson, Nov 4, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Justwhatingtoknow

    Mike Guest

    The machine that displays the actual address may only have one static
    address configured, and the other may have addresses aliased, or have
    multiple interfaced (multihomed).

    That would make the netstat report that it is listening on 0.0.0.0:80 (all
    active interfaces)

    -Mike
    "Matt Anderson" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    >
    > "Justwhatingtoknow" <> wrote in
    > message news:...
    >>I have a question about how netstat displays the netstat -na results. On
    >> some server w2k/2wk3 I do a netstat -na I see that port 80 is displayed
    >> as
    >> 0.0.0.0:80 and on other systems it show as the acutal ip... ie
    >> 12.12.12.12:80.
    >> This occurs even if IIS is set the same way. Where is the difference
    >> coming
    >> from. Where does netstat actually get is info... from the registry?
    >> Thanks in advanced.

    >
    > 0.0.0.0 means it's listening on all interfaces. Maybe not waht you want.
    > MS now has a port query tool and a parser to view the results. Also
    > sysinternals has tcpview. I like tcpview becuase it's graphical.
    >
    > Matt
    > MCT, MCSE
    >
     
    Mike, Nov 4, 2004
    #3
    1. Advertisements

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
  1. chiefek2

    Netstat

    chiefek2, Jun 14, 2007, in forum: Windows Vista Networking
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    389
    chiefek2
    Jun 14, 2007
  2. Don

    netstat

    Don, Apr 1, 2008, in forum: Windows Vista General Discussion
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    385
    Rick Rogers
    Apr 1, 2008
  3. +Bob+

    netstat -b fails to find process owning connection

    +Bob+, Sep 27, 2008, in forum: Windows Vista Networking
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    762
    +Bob+
    Sep 27, 2008
  4. +Bob+

    netstat -b issue / error

    +Bob+, Jan 25, 2009, in forum: Windows Vista Networking
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    801
    +Bob+
    Jan 25, 2009
  5. Ted Locke

    IE 7 and Netstat

    Ted Locke, May 8, 2007, in forum: Internet Explorer
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    295
    Rob ^_^
    May 8, 2007
  6. Joachim

    netstat -a and my listening sockets

    Joachim, Feb 17, 2006, in forum: Windows Media Center
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    312
    Gary Tsang
    Feb 17, 2006
  7. Steve Schofield
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    726
    Steve Schofield
    Jun 7, 2004
  8. Brian

    SYN_SENT using netstat -n

    Brian, Mar 17, 2005, in forum: Windows Server
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    538
    Brian
    Mar 17, 2005
Loading...