No reason to update to Vista

Discussion in 'Windows Vista Help' started by Joe, May 16, 2007.

  1. Joe

    Joe Guest

    For all the problems with printing, security lockdowns, unable to run,
    20 thousand step to get to a simple screen graphic card crashes you
    are all convincing me that my next machine will have XP Pro
    SP2.................

    Or

    I might just wait another 2 years for MS finally work be on Vista
    Ultimate SP3 and fix the mess and let the hardware catch on......


    No reason to upgrade


    Thanks you all
     
    Joe, May 16, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Couldn't agree more with you. Vista SUCKS BIGTIME!!!
     
    KickAssCowboy, May 17, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Joe

    LoneStar Guest

    OR............ you could just purchase a Vista system, like Dell's XPS, and
    enjoy a remarkable computer experience where everything works faster,
    prettier, and more efficiently. Note that a new system with preinstalled
    Vista has all the hardware and software compatibility working just fine.
    The "mess" that you're writing about is mostly the fault of users who don't
    know what they're doing.

    EW
     
    LoneStar, May 19, 2007
    #3
  4. Joe

    Venom Guest

    I agree with this poast completely. There is nothing wrong with buying a
    brand name computer using the finest hand picked factory seconds components
    that money can buy.
     
    Venom, May 19, 2007
    #4
  5. Joe

    Rafal Kubiak Guest

    Dnia Tue, 15 May 2007 19:10:57 -0400, Joe napisa³(a):
    You're right - you and only you are top world computer expert and your
    opinion is very important for us. Thank you my lord for share all those
    words. All computers runing Vista will crush down and world will sink in
    darkness... with printing problems and security lockdowns and totally
    unable to run.
     
    Rafal Kubiak, May 22, 2007
    #5
  6. Joe

    Dave Guest

    Why then does Vista require much faster hardware to run the same tasks
    as could be run on XP with lesser hardware? I find it hard to believe a
    faster system should require a faster computer to run tasks in a
    reasonable period of time.

    Of course if you buy a new computer, it is likly to be faster than your
    old one. I believe on the whole XP is faster, for the *same* hardware.
    Faster still is Linux of course.
    agreed.

    and more efficiently.

    I've seen no evidence of that.
     
    Dave, May 25, 2007
    #6
  7. Joe

    Venom Guest

    I agree with this poast. Vista users are complete and utter morons and
    should be strung up by the balls.
     
    Venom, May 25, 2007
    #7
  8. This one?

    http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/ubuntu?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs
     
    Carsten A. Arnholm, May 28, 2007
    #8
  9. Joe

    Guest Guest

    So Vista requires an expert installation by a computer manufacturer to
    get it right?
     
    Guest, Aug 2, 2007
    #9
  10. Joe

    Guest Guest

    This one?

    http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/ubuntu?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs[/QUOTE]

    More likely this one. >:)
    http://www.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.aspx/e510_nseries?c=us&cs=19&
    l=en&s=dhs
     
    Guest, Aug 2, 2007
    #10
  11. Joe

    Venom Guest

    And you forgot to mention made with the best quality factory seconds that
    money can buy.
     
    Venom, Aug 2, 2007
    #11
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.