"Real WMV", 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive scan image, "object data" bit-rate of 1b

Discussion in 'Windows Media Player' started by Radium, Oct 30, 2006.

  1. Radium

    Radium Guest

    Bob Myers wrote in
    http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.basics/msg/0d0bbebafddcd749?hl=en&
    :
    Why can't a WMV file of 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive
    scan image-resolution with 1-bit-per-second exist? Can't the
    color-depth be compressed enough to decrease the bit-rate to
    1-bit-per-second? What stopping such from taking place?
     
    Radium, Oct 30, 2006
    #1

    1. Advertisements

  2. Radium

    Bob Myers Guest

    Like I said, go read up on some basic information theory, and
    start thinking about what "1 bit per second" could actually convey.
    Don't expect everyone here to do ALL your thinking for you...

    Bob M.
     
    Bob Myers, Oct 30, 2006
    #2

    1. Advertisements

  3. Radium

    Bob Myers Guest

    Like I said, go read up on some basic information theory, and
    start thinking about what "1 bit per second" could actually convey.
    Don't expect everyone here to do ALL your thinking for you...

    Bob M.
     
    Bob Myers, Oct 30, 2006
    #3
  4. Radium

    Tobias Bergmann Guest

    Never heard of the millibit?

    OTOH, it might just have been the one "Switch the universe on"-bit that
    generates all our existence :p

    bis besser,
    Tobias
     
    Tobias Bergmann, Oct 30, 2006
    #4
  5. Radium

    Tobias Bergmann Guest

    Never heard of the millibit?

    OTOH, it might just have been the one "Switch the universe on"-bit that
    generates all our existence :p

    bis besser,
    Tobias
     
    Tobias Bergmann, Oct 30, 2006
    #5
  6. Radium

    Jukka Aho Guest

    I think you're going a bit too far.
     
    Jukka Aho, Oct 30, 2006
    #6
  7. Radium

    Jukka Aho Guest

    I think you're going a bit too far.
     
    Jukka Aho, Oct 30, 2006
    #7
  8. Radium

    Gene E. Bloch Guest

    *Now* I understand!
     
    Gene E. Bloch, Oct 30, 2006
    #8
  9. Radium

    Gene E. Bloch Guest

    *Now* I understand!
     
    Gene E. Bloch, Oct 30, 2006
    #9

    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. AMD 3400+ runs at ~800 Mhz!! Supposed to run at 2200 Mhz

  2. "Real WMV" 2-hour movie, 13.5 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progerssive scan image, 1-bit file size

  3. What is the highest sample-rate used for video? It is *not* 13.5 Mhz

  4. "Real WMV" 2-hour movie, 148.50 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progerssive scan image, 1-bit file size

  5. 2-hour length, 148.50 Mhz, 1920 x 1080 progressive scan image, 1-bit object data, 193 bits of file s

  6. "Real WMV", 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive scan image, "object data" bit-rate of 1-

  7. "Real WMV", 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive scan image, "object data" bit-rate of 1

  8. What I want "Real WMV", 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive scan image, lowest-possible

Loading...