SBS 2000 and SBS 2003: additional Domain Controllers

Discussion in 'Active Directory' started by Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP], Jan 31, 2005.

  1. Good morning!

    I just wanted to spread the word that in SBS 2000 and SBS 2003 environments
    you can indeed have another Domain Controller ( so long as it is running
    'just' Windows 2000 or Windows 2003 server and N*O*T SBS ) as long as that
    additional Domain Controller is simply 'an additional Domain Controller in
    an existing Domain'. In fact, for clarification you may have multiple
    additional Domain Controllers

    Furthermore, the SBS box needs to hold all five of the FSMO Roles ( Schema
    Master, Domain Naming Master, PDC Emulator, RID Master and Infrastructure
    Master ).

    The other more common restriction is that there can be no Trust set up in an
    SBS environment [ except, naturally, in the case whereby you set up a
    temporary Trust ( seven days ) to migrate from SBS 2000 to SBS 2003, IIRC ].

    There seems to be a common misconception that the SBS server is the only
    allowed Domain Controller. This is simply not the case. Just understand
    that the SBS box has to be the first Domain Controller ( as each
    installation of SBS starts a new forest ) in the environment!

    --
    Cary W. Shultz
    Roanoke, VA 24014
    Microsoft Active Directory MVP

    http://www.activedirectory-win2000.com
    http://www.grouppolicy-win2000.com
     
    Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP], Jan 31, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Yep - all true. Sadly, most people probably won't read/search/lurk in the
    newsgroups to find & read this before posting questions about same....
     
    Lanwench [MVP - Exchange], Jan 31, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Hello Cary, I have done several deployments with additional DCs to SBS
    envoirments for redundancy porpuse.

    --
    Regards
    Christoffer Andersson
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services

    No email replies please - reply in the newsgroup
     
    Chriss3 [MVP], Jan 31, 2005
    #3
  4. I always thought that was stupid but have never dabbled in SBS much. I
    guess everything you read on the internet is not true :)

    --

    Rodney Buike MCSE 2000/2003
    http://thelazyadmin.com


     
    Thelazyadmin.com, Jan 31, 2005
    #4
  5. Sure it is! Look, it's even got a nice font. It must be.
     
    Lanwench [MVP - Exchange], Feb 1, 2005
    #5
  6. Agreed.

    I guess that I started ( some three+ years ago ) simply looking through the
    newsgroups at the posts and trying to find the answer on my own in the lab.
    I then started searching for things ( such as 'replication' ) and became
    quite used to searching first, then posting. That is not to say that I did
    not sometimes post a question without looking for a similar topic ( and
    reply ). I think that everyone does this sometimes. But a lot of people
    would find answers within minutes were they to simply search first.

    How many times do we see the topic - in one form or another - of 'account
    lockout' or 'remove dead DC' or 'password policy' or 'Native Mode' each
    week? It seems to me that the same seven or eight questions are asked every
    week. I am not complaining. If people were to search before they posted
    they would probably have an answer faster! Minutes instead of hours or
    days! But it is all good!

    --
    Cary W. Shultz
    Roanoke, VA 24014
    Microsoft Active Directory MVP

    http://www.activedirectory-win2000.com
    http://www.grouppolicy-win2000.com



    "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"
     
    Cary Shultz [A.D. MVP], Feb 1, 2005
    #6
  7. Yep - and google is everyone's friend. ;)
     
    Lanwench [MVP - Exchange], Feb 2, 2005
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.