Use restrictec accounts instead of Admin accounts. Problem with runas and deny logon locally

Hello,

we would like to secure the way our users are logging on to their
computers.

Some of them are travelling a lot; others need to launch a specific
application etc... So I was thinking about creating another user
account for each of them who need one and to configure the policy "Deny
Logon Locally".

So they would have two accounts :
1. The normal account "username" used by default and for the basic
needs
2. The admin account "adm-username" with the "Deny logon locally"
applied to this account to restrict the user to open a session with
this account.

BUT...

It seems that the "runas" command cannot work if the account used for
the runas doesnt have the "logon locally" right.

So my question is "How can I prevent the "adm-username" account to be
able to logon locally and in the meanwhile to allow this account to
launch programs as admin ?

Thank you

--
Eric

 

Hello Eric,

If an account is restricted from local logon, how should it work locally?
If you really need some user with local elevated permissions, why not using
restricted groups and make them power users if this will be enough or local
administrator?

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


> Hello,
>
> we would like to secure the way our users are logging on to their
> computers.
>
> Some of them are travelling a lot; others need to launch a specific
> application etc... So I was thinking about creating another user
> account for each of them who need one and to configure the policy
> "Deny Logon Locally".
>
> So they would have two accounts :
> 1. The normal account "username" used by default and for the basic
> needs
> 2. The admin account "adm-username" with the "Deny logon locally"
> applied to this account to restrict the user to open a session with
> this account.
> BUT...
>
> It seems that the "runas" command cannot work if the account used for
> the runas doesnt have the "logon locally" right.
>
> So my question is "How can I prevent the "adm-username" account to be
> able to logon locally and in the meanwhile to allow this account to
> launch programs as admin ?
>
> Thank you
>

 

Re: Use restricted accounts instead of Admin accounts. Problem with runas and deny logon locally

Hello,

thank you for your answer.
The idea is to create a local admin account that will be ONLY available
for the "run as" command and that will not be able to logon to an
interactive session.

Why ?
Because in this situation the user will logon with a basic user account
and only needed applications will be launched with admin priviledges
(via the RunAS command). So, applications like Internet Explorer,
Outlook etc... will not run with admin priviledges.

But ?
But the problem is that I would like to be sure that users will not
logon directly with the admin accounts but it seems that the RunAS
command need the "logon locally right".

So my question is "How can I force users to use only their basic user
account and not the admin account when they logon interactively ?

I hope I am clear enough this time =)

Thanks

> Hello Eric,
>
> If an account is restricted from local logon, how should it work locally? If
> you really need some user with local elevated permissions, why not using
> restricted groups and make them power users if this will be enough or local
> administrator?
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> we would like to secure the way our users are logging on to their
>> computers.
>>
>> Some of them are travelling a lot; others need to launch a specific
>> application etc... So I was thinking about creating another user
>> account for each of them who need one and to configure the policy
>> "Deny Logon Locally".
>>
>> So they would have two accounts :
>> 1. The normal account "username" used by default and for the basic
>> needs
>> 2. The admin account "adm-username" with the "Deny logon locally"
>> applied to this account to restrict the user to open a session with
>> this account.
>> BUT...
>>
>> It seems that the "runas" command cannot work if the account used for
>> the runas doesnt have the "logon locally" right.
>>
>> So my question is "How can I prevent the "adm-username" account to be
>> able to logon locally and in the meanwhile to allow this account to
>> launch programs as admin ?
>>
>> Thank you
>>

--
Eric

 

Eric,
I can see what you mean. You want the users to be able to use an Admin
password but not to be able to log on with that account.
Vista UAC sounds like it may be the best you can do. That way the user is
prompted for if they really meant to do something, but they are able to do
it if they choose.
I think that is the best you are going to do
Anthony,
http://www.airdesk.com



"Eric" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hello,
>
> we would like to secure the way our users are logging on to their
> computers.
>
> Some of them are travelling a lot; others need to launch a specific
> application etc... So I was thinking about creating another user account
> for each of them who need one and to configure the policy "Deny Logon
> Locally".
>
> So they would have two accounts :
> 1. The normal account "username" used by default and for the basic needs
> 2. The admin account "adm-username" with the "Deny logon locally" applied
> to this account to restrict the user to open a session with this account.
>
> BUT...
>
> It seems that the "runas" command cannot work if the account used for the
> runas doesnt have the "logon locally" right.
>
> So my question is "How can I prevent the "adm-username" account to be able
> to logon locally and in the meanwhile to allow this account to launch
> programs as admin ?
>
> Thank you
>
> --
> Eric
>
>

 

Re: Use restricted accounts instead of Admin accounts. Problem with runas and deny logon locally

"Eric" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hello,
>
> thank you for your answer.
> The idea is to create a local admin account that will be ONLY available
> for the "run as" command and that will not be able to logon to an
> interactive session.
>
> Why ?
> Because in this situation the user will logon with a basic user account
> and only needed applications will be launched with admin priviledges (via
> the RunAS command). So, applications like Internet Explorer, Outlook
> etc... will not run with admin priviledges.

Just to give us an idea, what sorts of applications are being run that need
local administrator privileges? Might you have the option to modify these so
that the can be run by an account with regular user privileges?

> But ?
> But the problem is that I would like to be sure that users will not logon
> directly with the admin accounts but it seems that the RunAS command need
> the "logon locally right".

Are these users administrators in any other context in your organization? Or
are they regular users that need privileges just in order to run
applications that require elevated privileges?

If they are trusted with other privileged accounts, I'd suspect you would
only need ask them; if they are regular users, a better bet would be to find
a way to make the applications run without elevated privileges.

If you are concerned what havoc they might wreak on a computer or that they
would have access to other user files when logging in with a privileged
account, don't forget that logging in interactively is not the only way
these things can be done.

> So my question is "How can I force users to use only their basic user
> account and not the admin account when they logon interactively ?
>
> I hope I am clear enough this time =)

I think you were clear enough the first time. I'm just not sure that what
you see as your solution is actually possible. It's kind of like the old
story of the unhittable ball and the unmissable bat. Or maybe it's like the
question the little kid asked: "if god can do *anything*, can he make a rock
so heavy that he cannot lift it".

That said, have you tried your applications to see if they can be run by
"power users"?

/Al

> Thanks
>
>> Hello Eric,
>>
>> If an account is restricted from local logon, how should it work locally?
>> If you really need some user with local elevated permissions, why not
>> using restricted groups and make them power users if this will be enough
>> or local administrator?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Meinolf Weber
>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
>> confers no rights.
>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> we would like to secure the way our users are logging on to their
>>> computers.
>>>
>>> Some of them are travelling a lot; others need to launch a specific
>>> application etc... So I was thinking about creating another user
>>> account for each of them who need one and to configure the policy
>>> "Deny Logon Locally".
>>>
>>> So they would have two accounts :
>>> 1. The normal account "username" used by default and for the basic
>>> needs
>>> 2. The admin account "adm-username" with the "Deny logon locally"
>>> applied to this account to restrict the user to open a session with
>>> this account.
>>> BUT...
>>>
>>> It seems that the "runas" command cannot work if the account used for
>>> the runas doesnt have the "logon locally" right.
>>>
>>> So my question is "How can I prevent the "adm-username" account to be
>>> able to logon locally and in the meanwhile to allow this account to
>>> launch programs as admin ?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>
> --
> Eric
>
>

 

I had an idea that consist to change the "Shell" in
HKeyUser\SId\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon from
explorer.exe to "shutdown -l".

So the admin user has the right to open the session but the session
will close immediately

(I know that, as it is an admin, he could change the value to
explorer.exe).

Now my problem is ... I think that the admin account has to have
already opened a session one time on the computer to let me add the
"Shell" key.

Moreover this value has to be added for every different admin account
on every possible computers in the domain (or by restriting the admin
account for the user only to his specific computer ?).

If you have some advices, please let me know

Thanks

> Eric,
> I can see what you mean. You want the users to be able to use an Admin
> password but not to be able to log on with that account.
> Vista UAC sounds like it may be the best you can do. That way the user is
> prompted for if they really meant to do something, but they are able to do it
> if they choose.
> I think that is the best you are going to do
> Anthony,
> http://www.airdesk.com
>
>
>
> "Eric" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Hello,
>>
>> we would like to secure the way our users are logging on to their
>> computers.
>>
>> Some of them are travelling a lot; others need to launch a specific
>> application etc... So I was thinking about creating another user account
>> for each of them who need one and to configure the policy "Deny Logon
>> Locally".
>>
>> So they would have two accounts :
>> 1. The normal account "username" used by default and for the basic needs
>> 2. The admin account "adm-username" with the "Deny logon locally" applied
>> to this account to restrict the user to open a session with this account.
>>
>> BUT...
>>
>> It seems that the "runas" command cannot work if the account used for the
>> runas doesnt have the "logon locally" right.
>>
>> So my question is "How can I prevent the "adm-username" account to be able
>> to logon locally and in the meanwhile to allow this account to launch
>> programs as admin ?
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -- Eric
>>
>>

--
Eric